On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 12:28 -0600, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
> I submitted a patch a while back to use getpagesize(), which I believe
> is the more portable version since there are a few variations on
> _SC_PAGE_SIZE.
>
You're right! :)
Is there any reason for keeping this from being commited?
>
Hi,
I know that screen locking had or maybe still has some known issues, but I
thought I should mention this nonetheless... After locking the screen I can't
unlock it again by typing in my password. All that helps is sending the
enlightenment process a -HUP from console. This looks like the opp
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:01:22PM +0100, Nikolas Arend wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know that screen locking had or maybe still has some known issues, but I
> thought I should mention this nonetheless... After locking the screen I can't
> unlock it again by typing in my password. All that helps is sendin
I believe I had some feedback that it fixed the build, but wasn't sure
if it actually worked for the FB. I don't have a PowerPC Linux system
installed right now to test on.
On 12/12/06, Falko Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 12:28 -0600, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
> > I subm
Aleksej Struk wrote:
> Screen lock uses PAM to check the correctness of the password.
> E checks if one of the following PAM services exists and then uses it:
>
> * login
> * enlightenment
> * xscreensaver
> * kscreensaver
> * system-auth
>
> Maybe that your problem is in PAM configuration
I thoug
When I was using SuSE I could never get desklock to work with it. I
copied the PAM file for entrance to enlightenment, but that didn't work
either. Entrance works fine with it, and it's config file was itself
copied from the GDB one supplied by SuSE.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
---
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:28:01PM +0100, Nikolas Arend wrote:
> Aleksej Struk wrote:
> > Screen lock uses PAM to check the correctness of the password.
> > E checks if one of the following PAM services exists and then uses it:
> >
> > * login
> > * enlightenment
> > * xscreensaver
> > * kscreensav
David Seikel wrote:
> When I was using SuSE I could never get desklock to work with it. I
> copied the PAM file for entrance to enlightenment, but that didn't work
> either. Entrance works fine with it, and it's config file was itself
> copied from the GDB one supplied by SuSE.
Hmpf. Is anybody
Aleksej Struk wrote:
>
> Both PAM services that you've listed uses common-auth service. I do
> not have such service on my gentoo machine. I suspect thatit is called
> system-auth and is configured as follows:
>
>
> auth required pam_env.so
> auth sufficient pam_unix.so likeauth n
On Tuesday, 12 December 2006, at 16:44:21 (+),
Aleksej Struk wrote:
> Both PAM services that you've listed uses common-auth service. I do
> not have such service on my gentoo machine.
Gentoo is hardly an authoritative source for PAM...or anything else,
for that matter.
> I suspect thatit is
Hi,
Can confirm, sometimes it is impossible to unlock screen. CentOS 4.3 i386.
It's looks like focus is still remains at main screen windows layer,
because Alt-Tab is moving mouse on windows.
You see "Enter your password" but all input goes to last selected window :(
But i can't reproduce it on h
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:16:55 +0200 "Ag. System Administrator"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can confirm, sometimes it is impossible to unlock screen. CentOS 4.3
> i386. It's looks like focus is still remains at main screen windows
> layer, because Alt-Tab is moving mouse on windows.
> You see "Ent
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:46:06 +0100 "Nikolas Arend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> David Seikel wrote:
> > When I was using SuSE I could never get desklock to work with it. I
> > copied the PAM file for entrance to enlightenment, but that didn't work
> > either. Entrance works fine with it, and i
13 matches
Mail list logo
