Could someone apply this patch for me? I am on the road and have limited access.
On 10/1/07, Brett Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff -u -r1.46 ewl_config.c
> --- tools/ewl_config/ewl_config.c 23 Aug 2007 05:26:52 - 1.46
> +++ tools/ewl_config/ewl_config.c 2 Oct 2007 00:15
On 10/2/07, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could someone apply this patch for me? I am on the road and have limited
> access.
Done.
--
Chady 'Leviathan' Kassouf
http://chady.net/
-
This SF.net email is sp
On 10/1/07, Ulisses Furquim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/1/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/1/07, David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:04:33 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
hey,
I have added in e17/test/unit unit tests for ecore_file. Currently, only
dome functions of ecore_files are tested
The check library [1] is used to create easily the unit tests
You must install the test to run it. If you install it in a prefix where
you can not write, one test will fail.
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Vincent Torri wrote:
> I have added in e17/test/unit unit tests for ecore_file. Currently, only
> dome functions of ecore_files are tested
is there a reason it isnt just integrated into ecore ? seems weird to have
testsuites forked off from the actual packages ...
-mi
Hi,
On 10/2/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These scripts just call setup.py (distutils), these should check for
> pkg-config and fail if some are missing, generating the log to stderr.
> The nightly build scripts should send these logs if packages fail.
Yes, I know that
On 10/2/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > I have added in e17/test/unit unit tests for ecore_file. Currently, only
> > dome functions of ecore_files are tested
>
> is there a reason it isnt just integrated into ecore ? seems weird
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> is there a reason it isnt just integrated into ecore ? seems weird to have
> testsuites forked off from the actual packages ...
reason == raster
I've asked him where to put it. He told me there.
I would have prefer in ecore, just to use gcov / lco
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> and any reasons why it is xml? Is it full of nested data? IMHO it's
> better to just output CSV, maybe like /etc/passwd, it's easier to
> read, process...
the output is xml because there's a function that export the result in
xml. I can use
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2007-10-02 07:03:01 -0700
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
engage http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/engage.log
entropy http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/entropy.log
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Michael Jennings wrote:
Most of that sounds fine, but why not provide us with a sample
configure.in with examples of all 5 changes made to it so we can get a
more concrete idea of what you're wanting to do? Then if people have
any specific objections, they're easier to no
On Tuesday, 02 October 2007, at 18:31:34 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
> I've attached a patch for (for instance) edje, that shows the
> modifications I want to do.
>
> I've put the libtool doc about its versioning, but it's not
> necessary to include it in configure.in.
>
> so, what is goo
You are correct, looks like we were over-eager checking our pointers.
On 10/2/07, Enlightenment CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : pfritz
> Project : e17
> Module : libs/ewl
>
> Dir : e17/libs/ewl/src/lib
>
>
> Modified Files:
> ewl_embed.c
>
>
On Friday, 14 September 2007, at 23:10:29 (-0400),
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
> +/*
> + * These are the currently planned wizard pages:
> + *
> + * o == interactive
> + * . == automatic (no gui)
> + *
> + * --- THE LIST
> + * . look for system global profile - if it exists just copy it and exit
>
Hi guys,
Someone made a change to CVS that turned things really slow on N800
devices. Since expedite still runs quite fast, so I believe it is
related to Ecore (EcoreEvas?) or Edje.
We're trying to hunt it, but if you have a clue, then say to help us
saving time.
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
---
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Someone made a change to CVS that turned things really slow on N800
> devices. Since expedite still runs quite fast, so I believe it is
> related to Ecore (EcoreEvas?) or Edje.
>
> We're trying to hunt it, but if you have a clue,
On 10/2/07, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Someone made a change to CVS that turned things really slow on N800
> > devices. Since expedite still runs quite fast, so I believe it is
> > related to Ecore (EcoreEvas
On 10/2/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Someone made a change to CVS that turned things really slow on N800
> devices. Since expedite still runs quite fast, so I believe it is
> related to Ecore (EcoreEvas?) or Edje.
>
> We're trying to hunt it, but if you hav
On 10/2/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Someone made a change to CVS that turned things really slow on N800
> > devices. Since expedite still runs quite fast, so I believe it is
> > relate
On 10/2/07, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, 14 September 2007, at 23:10:29 (-0400),
> Enlightenment CVS wrote:
>
>>
> > + * o do you want a taskbar or not.
>
> Given the (lack of) attention in that department, I'm not sure we want
> to promote it.
>
I agree that in i
Hi,
On 10/2/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://staff.get-e.org/?p=e17/libs/eet.git;a=commitdiff;h=f64fe1386f0a1c4a302d8a11d1c9b0c61d0bb401
> >
> > doursse, can you take a look?
>
> Damn, andré found it: somehow "char" is unsigned in maemo, this was
> bring to eye du
On 10/2/07, Enlightenment CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Log Message:
> Since Gustavo changed the order of EVAS_CALLBACK_FREE's event in
> evas_object_main.c, we have to call the model's custom free callback before
> we delete the object from the tree.
>
> This brings up a question though, will
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:49:58 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On 10/2/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/2/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > Someone made a change to CVS that turned things
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:42:06 -0300 "Ulisses Furquim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/2/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://staff.get-e.org/?p=e17/libs/eet.git;a=commitdiff;h=f64fe1386f0a1c4a302d8a11d1c9b0c61d0bb401
> > >
> > > doursse, can you take a l
On 10/3/07, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:42:06 -0300 "Ulisses Furquim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 10/2/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > http://staff.get-e.org/?p=e17/libs/eet.git;a=commitdif
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 00:21:03 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On 10/3/07, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:42:06 -0300 "Ulisses Furquim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 10/2/07, Gustavo S
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
>while ((p < (char *)src_end) && (*p != 0)) {len++; p++;}
> +
> + /* fast handle of simple case 0xMp+E*/
> + if ((len == 6) && (s[0] == '0') && (s[1] == 'x') && (s[3] == 'p'))
> + {
> + int mantisse = (s[2] >= 'a') ? (s[2] - 'a' + 10)
27 matches
Mail list logo
