Hi all,
After I developed Ecore_IM I figured it out that a lot of code, macros, etc.
are duplicated all around the code (EAPI definition, ECORE_MAGIC
check, ...).
I would like to propose a support library (Ecore_Support) that all ecore
modules could use, maybe even other modules as e_dbus (to chec
Rather than introducing another internal dependency that may
complicate things when ecore is eventually split up, could these go in
the Ecore_Data definitions? I believe everything in ecore depends on
this either directly or indirectly anyways.
On 11/18/07, Andre Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
does anyone actually need --with-enlightenment-config ? its functionality can
already be achieved by doing E_CONFIG=...
otherwise i'll just toss it
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Nov 18, 2007 2:07 PM, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rather than introducing another internal dependency that may
> complicate things when ecore is eventually split up, could these go in
> the Ecore_Data definitions? I believe everything in ecore depends on
> this either directly
On Nov 18, 2007 11:52 AM, Andre Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After I developed Ecore_IM I figured it out that a lot of code, macros, etc.
> are duplicated all around the code (EAPI definition, ECORE_MAGIC
> check, ...).
> I would like to propose a support library (Ecore_Suppor
On Nov 18, 2007 4:55 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a side note, I really think we should stop stuffing Ecore with
> all of this stuff. I would vote for splitting it up asap and not
> adding any more stuff in there.
While I agree, what are the plans of a split? Will it be d
On Nov 18, 2007 3:14 PM, Andre Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 4:55 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just a side note, I really think we should stop stuffing Ecore with
> > all of this stuff. I would vote for splitting it up asap and not
> > adding any mor
On Nov 18, 2007 5:16 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The situation is, everyone knows we should split up ecore, but
> everyone just keeps adding to it because no one is willing to split it
> up and cope with fixing the breakage. The more this keeps on being
> done, the harder its
On Nov 18, 2007 3:19 PM, Andre Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 5:16 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The situation is, everyone knows we should split up ecore, but
> > everyone just keeps adding to it because no one is willing to split it
> > up and cope w
On Nov 18, 2007 5:19 PM, Andre Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 5:16 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The situation is, everyone knows we should split up ecore, but
> > everyone just keeps adding to it because no one is willing to split it
> > up and cope w
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2007-11-18 15:50:54 -0800
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
edvi http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/edvi.log
eflpp http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/eflpp.log
elitair
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:41:00 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> does anyone actually need --with-enlightenment-config ? its functionality
> can already be achieved by doing E_CONFIG=...
what is that an option to? :)
--
- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am"
On Nov 18, 2007 9:51 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 5:19 PM, Andre Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 18, 2007 5:16 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The situation is, everyone knows we should split up ecore, but
> > > eve
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:02:40 +0100 "Jorge Luis Zapata Muga"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
my plan was just to split it with no renaming. ecore builds as ecore.
ecore_evas builds as ecore_evas with its own configure etc. no need to change
names of api calls etc. at all. this won't break any apps (ma
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:41:00 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> > does anyone actually need --with-enlightenment-config ? its
> > functionality can already be achieved by doing E_CONFIG=...
>
> what is that an option to? :)
t
On Nov 18, 2007 11:09 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:02:40 +0100 "Jorge Luis Zapata Muga"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> my plan was just to split it with no renaming. ecore builds as ecore.
> ecore_evas builds as ecore_evas with its own c
16 matches
Mail list logo
