On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:56:04 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN"
> said:
>
> and what valgrind complaint is this... that it complains if a struct is NOT
> packed? this is highly suspicious... :)
>
Valgrind complaint that the memory
Please no. In ideal world it should not be required, I just leave it
to comparison
On 2/12/09, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:42 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:07:39 +0200 Ogu
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:08:09 +0100 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:45 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:56:04 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN"
> > said:
> >
> > and what valgrind complaint is this... that it complains if a struct is NOT
> > packed? t
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:22:14AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> technically you should memset() the entire sizeof(struct) to 0 first to ensure
> it is 0.
Technically that is only silencing Valgrind and redundant from the PoV
of C. If that is the goal, memset is the right approach; packed is ve
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:05:17 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN"
said:
:):):)
> Log:
> * evas/lib/canvas/evas_async_events.c: Use memset instead of PACKED.
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2009-02-12 09:05:17 -0800 (Thu, 12 Feb 2009)
> New Revision: 39003
>
> Modified:
> trunk/eva
