Re: [E-devel] Edje translations - Why they shouldn't be inside .edj's

2010-08-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:35:58 +0900 Mike McCormack mj.mccorm...@samsung.com said: On 08/27/2010 01:37 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: The pre-alpha excuse won't last for much longer. we're not pre-alpha anymore. we WERE and your issue is that your pre-alpha build edje files

Re: [E-devel] Edje translations - Why they shouldn't be inside .edj's

2010-08-27 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Mike McCormack mj.mccorm...@samsung.com wrote: Guys, just one request: If you change the format of .edj again, please add a version number to the binary format so that you can still parse the old format, and build backwards compatibility into the code.

Re: [E-devel] Edje translations - Why they shouldn't be inside .edj's

2010-08-27 Thread Sachiel
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: e17's config files have had versions in them for YEARS now. they actually have managed to forward-port and upgrade many versions over the years. there is even a major and minor version segment of the version (major

Re: [E-devel] Edje translations - Why they shouldn't be inside .edj's

2010-08-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:50:38 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) sachi...@gmail.com said: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: e17's config files have had versions in them for YEARS now. they actually have managed to forward-port and upgrade many versions

Re: [E-devel] Edje translations - Why they shouldn't be inside .edj's

2010-08-27 Thread Sachiel
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:50:38 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) sachi...@gmail.com said: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: e17's config files have had versions in them for

[E-devel] ChangeLog ?

2010-08-27 Thread Cedric BAIL
Hi, So we are in Alpha now. This raised a question, how and when do we fill ChangeLog ? Do we start to fill them now or after the first release ? What do we put in them ? For Eet, I add entry in the ChangeLog every time I add a feature or fix a bug present in an older release. I don't

Re: [E-devel] ChangeLog ?

2010-08-27 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Cedric BAIL wrote: Hi, So we are in Alpha now. This raised a question, how and when do we fill ChangeLog ? Do we start to fill them now or after the first release ? What do we put in them ? For Eet, I add entry in the ChangeLog every time I add a feature or fix

[E-devel] Proposed API addition to Ecore_Con

2010-08-27 Thread Nick Mekius_ Hughart
The attached patch adds a new function called ecore_con_server_name_get. All it does is return the name field of the given Ecore_Con_Server object. Since we are in this alpha state I was unsure if such an addition was possible, but I think it can be useful. Without this I will have to store a

[E-devel] eina broken in alpha

2010-08-27 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
Just fyi, the alpha release of eina is broken when you try to compile some of the modules due to the move of eina_private.h from include/ to lib/. Whoever moved this should have done a test compile. -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: Our boolean values are huge.

Re: [E-devel] eina broken in alpha

2010-08-27 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: Just fyi, the alpha release of eina is broken when you try to compile some of the modules due to the move of eina_private.h from include/ to lib/. Whoever moved this should have done a test compile. I think that now we are in alpha, before

Re: [E-devel] Proposed API addition to Ecore_Con

2010-08-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:39:54 -0500 Nick \Mekius_\ Hughart mek...@gmail.com said: The attached patch adds a new function called ecore_con_server_name_get. All it does is return the name field of the given Ecore_Con_Server object. Since we are in this alpha state I was unsure if such an

Re: [E-devel] ChangeLog ?

2010-08-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:45:19 +0200 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr said: after first release. ie 1.0.0 (not alpha or beta). first entry will be 1.0.0 release. i think the eet changelog way is the right way - it's not a revisioning system. we dont keep every small little thing there. we keep, as