David Seikel, il 27/01/2012 23:50, ha scritto:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:41:24 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>
>> *While it will be half-french, it will NOT make its own baguettes
>> ???
>
> Croissants?
crepes? :P
--
Massimo Maiurana massimoragusa.linux.it
http://massimo.so
For those that were having composite problems with x11_gl because of
this, can you provide more detail please ?? I ask because composite
worked fine here (software_x11) even when this was enabled.
dh
On 01/27/12 10:08, Christopher Michael wrote:
> Fixed in 67568.
>
> I just disable the recent c
2012/1/28 Massimo Maiurana :
> David Seikel, il 27/01/2012 23:50, ha scritto:
>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:41:24 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> *While it will be half-french, it will NOT make its own baguettes
>>> ???
>>
>> Croissants?
>
> crepes? :P
>
Froggies know how to do other thin
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> For those that were having composite problems with x11_gl because of this,
> can you provide more detail please ?? I ask because composite worked fine
> here (software_x11) even when this was enabled.
It wasn't working properly with bo
On 01/28/12 10:10, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>> For those that were having composite problems with x11_gl because of this,
>> can you provide more detail please ?? I ask because composite worked fine
>> here (software_x11) even when this wa
On 01/28/12 10:12, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 01/28/12 10:10, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Michael
>>wrote:
>>> For those that were having composite problems with x11_gl because of this,
>>> can you provide more detail please ?? I ask because composite
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 01/28/12 10:12, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> On 01/28/12 10:10, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Michael
>>> wrote:
For those that were having composite problems with x11_gl because of
On 01/28/12 16:24, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>> On 01/28/12 10:12, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>> On 01/28/12 10:10, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> For those that were hav
On 01/28/12 17:01, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 01/28/12 16:24, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Christopher Michael
>> wrote:
>>> On 01/28/12 10:12, Christopher Michael wrote:
On 01/28/12 10:10, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Christopher Mi
