1. We don't return any error result values by APIs. That's so we need to print
warning and error messages.
2. User should fix all warnings & errors before releasing their programs.
3. So in release version, they will be overhead. I prefer removing them.
-Re
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 05/09/12 19:14, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> I am sick and tired of hearing that "EFL code sucks" because of those
>> missing exception handlings.
>>
>
> I'm out, so I'll give you a full reply tomorrow, but just regarding this
> sentence: mayb
For consistency, EINA_SAFETY_ON_NULL_RETURN.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "Daniel Juyung Seo"
To: "Tom Hacohen";
Cc: "Enlightenment developer list";
Sent: 2012-09-06 (목) 13:27:29
Subject: Re: [E-devel] Add Null Chekcing Routine in eet_l
> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:45:27 -0300
> From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor IN trunk/e/src: bin
> modules/fileman
> To: Enlightenment developer list
>
> Cc: "enlightenment-...@lists.sourceforge.net"
>
> Message-ID:
> vcresh
> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:26:49 +0200
> From: Leif Middelschulte
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Call for Packagers
> To: Enlightenment developer list
>
> Message-ID: <5313fd14-f083-4dda-afb8-032e903cc...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Am 05.09.2012 um 04:24 schrieb
Raster and I completely agree here, so you can see most of "my" response
in his email in his words. :)
But there's one more thing I wanted to add: I love error-free and
defensive coding, I think it's good and needed. I'm not arguing here
whether we should write safe code or not, I'm arguing abo
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> engage is broken, so to BROKEN with it until someone wants to fix it
Please revert, it work for me from yesterday svn.
--
Cedric BAIL
--
Live Security Vi
and it breaks for everyone else, according to all the users who had it
crashing. feel free to move it back if you want to fix it and deal with
their bug reports.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
> > Log:
> > engage i
On 06/09/12 09:43, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
>> Log:
>> engage is broken, so to BROKEN with it until someone wants to fix it
>
> Please revert, it work for me from yesterday svn.
>
For me too. And heck, even if it was broken, you should make a
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> and it breaks for everyone else, according to all the users who had it
> crashing. feel free to move it back if you want to fix it and deal with
> their bug reports.
I never saw any relevant bug report regarding engage and it has been
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
