[E-devel] New Eo event signature

2016-02-29 Thread Tom Hacohen
Hey, As some of you may have noticed, I changed the signature of Eo callbacks a bit. This change was first proposed in the "EFL Animator" thread by Marcel Hollerbach, so many thanks to him. The aim of this change is to make it less annoying to use callbacks when not using all of the parameters

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 02/03: Edje_Edit: support new edje top block "text classes" with edje_edit API

2016-02-29 Thread Tom Hacohen
To both the reviewer and the original author: This introduces new *REAL* warnings. You are returning EINA_FALSE in a function that is meant to return a stringshare. Copy-pasting code is bad, copy-pasting code without checking it's not absolutely broken is worse. Please check your compilation ou

Re: [E-devel] New Eo event signature

2016-02-29 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:45:33 + Tom Hacohen wrote: > Hey, > > As some of you may have noticed, I changed the signature of Eo > callbacks a bit. This change was first proposed in the "EFL Animator" > thread by Marcel Hollerbach, so many thanks to him. > > The aim of this change is to make it

Re: [E-devel] New Eo event signature

2016-02-29 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 29/02/16 11:57, David Seikel wrote: > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:45:33 + Tom Hacohen > wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> As some of you may have noticed, I changed the signature of Eo >> callbacks a bit. This change was first proposed in the "EFL Animator" >> thread by Marcel Hollerbach, so many thanks to

Re: [E-devel] New Eo event signature

2016-02-29 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:10:07 + Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 29/02/16 11:57, David Seikel wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:45:33 + Tom Hacohen > > wrote: > > > >> Hey, > >> > >> As some of you may have noticed, I changed the signature of Eo > >> callbacks a bit. This change was first proposed

[E-devel] Weekly news from the automated build and QA front

2016-02-29 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. Summary: o Our bug count is still increasing and about to reach 800 open issues This should give everyone an overview over what has happened in the last week on the QA front. The numbers in parentheses reflect the values from last week to give you a trend. CI: o Overall build statistic:

Re: [E-devel] New Eo event signature

2016-02-29 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 29/02/16 12:45, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Hey, > > As some of you may have noticed, I changed the signature of Eo callbacks > a bit. This change was first proposed in the "EFL Animator" thread by > Marcel Hollerbach, so many thanks to him. > > The aim of this change is to make it less annoyin

Re: [E-devel] New Eo event signature

2016-02-29 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 29/02/16 12:42, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 29/02/16 12:45, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> Hey, >> >> As some of you may have noticed, I changed the signature of Eo callbacks >> a bit. This change was first proposed in the "EFL Animator" thread by >> Marcel Hollerbach, so many thanks to him. >>

Re: [E-devel] Weekly news from the automated build and QA front

2016-02-29 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
Your continued mails have motivated me. As of this moment, Enlightenment now has 0 defects reported. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:35 AM Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > Summary: > o Our bug count is still increasing and about to reach 800 open issues > > > This should give everyone an overview ov

Re: [E-devel] Weekly news from the automated build and QA front

2016-02-29 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 29/02/16 16:52, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > Your continued mails have motivated me. As of this moment, Enlightenment > now has 0 defects reported. That is really great to hear! Thanks a lot for this work! regards Stefan Schmidt --

Re: [E-devel] Weekly news from the automated build and QA front

2016-02-29 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:13:11 +0100 Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 29/02/16 16:52, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > Your continued mails have motivated me. As of this moment, > > Enlightenment now has 0 defects reported. > > That is really great to hear! Thanks a lot for this work! Zarro boo

Re: [E-devel] efl / eo interfaces -> multiple event loops + ownership

2016-02-29 Thread Cedric BAIL
Hello, On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > we were discussing this and i don't remember an adequate solution. > > so we're needing to allow multiple event loops (main loop). > > ok = first loop created == main loop. fine. store that in a global. > > but after this... what l

Re: [E-devel] efl / eo interfaces -> multiple event loops + ownership

2016-02-29 Thread Tom Hacohen
Yes, I already told him that on IRC. The cost of caching is most likely higher than the cost of calculating every time, and anyway, it's rare for an object to need to have information about the mainloop, adding a cache on every object is a bad idea, calculating on creation is the way to go. On Mon

Re: [E-devel] efl / eo interfaces -> multiple event loops + ownership

2016-02-29 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Yes, I already told him that on IRC. The cost of caching is most likely > higher than the cost of calculating every time, and anyway, it's rare for > an object to need to have information about the mainloop, adding a cache on > every object is

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [apps/ephoto] master 01/01: Ephoto: Move to Ecore_File_Monitor: It behaves better than Eio at this point.

2016-02-29 Thread Davide Andreoli
2016-02-29 18:16 GMT+01:00 Stephen okra Houston : > okra pushed a commit to branch master. > > > http://git.enlightenment.org/apps/ephoto.git/commit/?id=97e82b216f0191697691d768451cca6824d447e6 > > commit 97e82b216f0191697691d768451cca6824d447e6 > Author: Stephen okra Houston > Date: Mon Feb 29

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [apps/ephoto] master 01/01: Ephoto: Move to Ecore_File_Monitor: It behaves better than Eio at this point.

2016-02-29 Thread Stephen Houston
The exact opposite of you. Ecore_File's monitors can handle two at the same time just fine for me. EIO monitors don't always notify accurately... likely an async issue. Ecore worked, eio didnt, and i dont have a lot of spare time for development this month, so what i do have, i want to spend on

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [apps/ephoto] master 01/01: Ephoto: Move to Ecore_File_Monitor: It behaves better than Eio at this point.

2016-02-29 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Feb 29, 2016 11:30, "Davide Andreoli" wrote: > > 2016-02-29 18:16 GMT+01:00 Stephen okra Houston : > > > okra pushed a commit to branch master. > > > > > > http://git.enlightenment.org/apps/ephoto.git/commit/?id=97e82b216f0191697691d768451cca6824d447e6 > > > > commit 97e82b216f0191697691d768451

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [apps/ephoto] master 01/01: Ephoto: Move to Ecore_File_Monitor: It behaves better than Eio at this point.

2016-02-29 Thread Stephen Houston
According to the docs, Ecore_File_Monitors do work on Windows. As for the question of why I switched from Eio, I already answered it. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Feb 29, 2016 11:30, "Davide Andreoli" wrote: > > > > 2016-02-29 18:16 GMT+01:00 Stephen okra Houston :

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [apps/ephoto] master 01/01: Ephoto: Move to Ecore_File_Monitor: It behaves better than Eio at this point.

2016-02-29 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Stephen Houston wrote: > According to the docs, Ecore_File_Monitors do work on Windows. Docs is wrong :-) > As for the question of why I switched from Eio, I already answered it. Yes, but your bug report doesn't really help. You don't describe how to see the is

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [apps/ephoto] master 01/01: Ephoto: Move to Ecore_File_Monitor: It behaves better than Eio at this point.

2016-02-29 Thread Stephen Houston
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Stephen Houston > wrote: > > According to the docs, Ecore_File_Monitors do work on Windows. > > Docs is wrong :-) > So efl/src/lib/ecore_file/ecore_file_monitor_win32.c : https://git.enlightenment.org/core/ef

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [apps/ephoto] master 01/01: Ephoto: Move to Ecore_File_Monitor: It behaves better than Eio at this point.

2016-02-29 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Stephen Houston wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Stephen Houston >> wrote: >> > According to the docs, Ecore_File_Monitors do work on Windows. >> >> Docs is wrong :-) >> > So efl/src/lib/ecore_file/

Re: [E-devel] efl / eo interfaces -> multiple event loops + ownership

2016-02-29 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:45:15 + Tom Hacohen said: > Yes, I already told him that on IRC. The cost of caching is most likely > higher than the cost of calculating every time, and anyway, it's rare for > an object to need to have information about the mainloop, adding a cache on > every object i

Re: [E-devel] efl / eo interfaces -> multiple event loops + ownership

2016-02-29 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Feb 29, 2016 17:46, "Carsten Haitzler" wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:45:15 + Tom Hacohen said: > > > Yes, I already told him that on IRC. The cost of caching is most likely > > higher than the cost of calculating every time, and anyway, it's rare for > > an object to need to have infor

Re: [E-devel] efl / eo interfaces -> multiple event loops + ownership

2016-02-29 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:10:02 -0800 Cedric BAIL said: > On Feb 29, 2016 17:46, "Carsten Haitzler" wrote: > > > > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:45:15 + Tom Hacohen said: > > > > > Yes, I already told him that on IRC. The cost of caching is most likely > > > higher than the cost of calculating every

Re: [E-devel] efl / eo interfaces -> multiple event loops + ownership

2016-02-29 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:10:02 -0800 Cedric BAIL said: >> On Feb 29, 2016 17:46, "Carsten Haitzler" wrote: >> > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:45:15 + Tom Hacohen said: >> > > Yes, I already told him that on IRC. The cost of caching is most li

Re: [E-devel] efl / eo interfaces -> multiple event loops + ownership

2016-02-29 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 05:20:56 +0100 Cedric BAIL said: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:10:02 -0800 Cedric BAIL said: > >> On Feb 29, 2016 17:46, "Carsten Haitzler" wrote: > >> > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:45:15 + Tom Hacohen said: > >> > > Yes