I am a bit curious where you think we need this much work with triaging?
The biggest issue that we will have here is actually from our
passive-aggressive method of rejecting things we don't like. For example,
there are many, many patches that have been rejected and are idle for a
long time but not
The way I see it if there is lack of activity it gets closed and if need be
reopened when the issue resurfaced
Sent from my iPhone
> On 16 Aug 2018, at 16:29, Mike Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>
> I am a bit curious where you think we need this much work with triaging?
>
> The biggest issue that we
Also to add I think stuff wiht lack of activity or things have changed
for now should be closed as well. I see the issue tracker as something
for key issues that are reproducible as well as key things that need to
get done that are key for a release or bugs to be fixed.
On 2018-08-16 14:38, Jo
