If ll is NULL then rel->item->items must be NULL ... i dont see how
_list_last_recursive can return NULL otherwise.
Greetings,
bu5hm4n
On 9/27/18 7:08 AM, Yeongjong Lee wrote:
hermet pushed a commit to branch master.
http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=39de8cdc752f4454dc17
Yes. :)
On 9/26/18 6:51 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:44:54 +0200 Vincent Torri said:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 6:24 PM Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
Hello,
new update!
Everything beside the bindings is added, there is a README that sums up
everything. All kn
Hello,
On 9/27/18 12:43 AM, Simon Lees wrote:
On 27/09/2018 02:21, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:32:00 +0900 Hermet Park said:
then do we expect users need to toggle features on/off manually?
I would say so - yes. automagic has downsides for reproducible
You're right.
Some of static code analyzer(i.e. coverity, we are currently using) could
return false-alarm like this case.
In this case, _list_last_recursive() could return NULL value.
_list_lat_recursive()
{
...
ll = eina_list_last(..) ;
if (!ll) return NULL;
...
}
Means that caller m
