-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:55:54 +0300
Viktor Kojouharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
regarding the xml parser, why not use exml, if it is maintained at
all. since it is in cvs, it's most likely a dependency for something
else already.
I choose libxml
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Massimiliano Calamelli wrote:
I choose libxml instead of exml because exml doesn't provide a SAX
parser, but only a DOM parser, and i prefer the first one.
and expat ?
Vincent
-
This SF.Net email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:11:11 +0200
Sevcsik András [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to create an evas smart object which
contains the whole exchange client, so devs could easily integrate it in
their apps' GUI, and it would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:37:32 -0400
Sthithaprajna Garapaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what I think the Exchange Library should be able to do:
- Register new users Login/Logout.
- Retrieve a list of themes
- This list can be filtered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:10:56 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and expat ?
Vincent
Never used, so no knowledge, but if you think/know that it provides
same features/facilities of libxml i can check it.
Massimiliano
- --
- Massimiliano Calamelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:11:11 +0200
Sevcsik András [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to create an evas smart object
which
contains the whole exchange
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cedric wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the reasons people prefer one type of license over another..
and does that affect the number or quality of contributors or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:52:27 +0200 (CEST)
Dave Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can do this smart object for you. One of the first apps I wrote using
edje was a clone of gnome-art, I nener finished the app but I have a great
edje file for the
Hello,
I have updated the archive I posted before and provided the same package for
Eet. And again I'd like to ask you to examine them and post any notes if you
have.
Here are they:
http://sionix.pbwiki.com/f/Evil_win32.zip
http://sionix.pbwiki.com/f/Eet_win32.zip
Both should be unpacked to
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Cedric BAIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smarter or not.. again, who really knows. Companies make their choices,
individuals make theirs.. each based on whatever set of reasons. Sometimes
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2008-07-24 07:11:01 -0700
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
enna http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/enna.log
epdf http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/epdf.log
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:45:47 +0200 Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Hi all,
I dont pretend to start a flamewar, if you do, please dont answer this
thread.The thing is that right now, the EFL has arrived to a place
where different companies are using this software, and
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:20:07 -0400 Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
I'm not sure that the 'majority of the work' was done by people who
*like* that license, not for every sub-project.. or even if partly so,
whether that will continue to be the case -- or more to the point,
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:57:10 +0200 Cedric BAIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
just to summaries - i am not in agrement lgpl will help over bsd, BUT... i also
have nothing against lgpl... i DO have a lot against gpl - in fatc qt's gpl
license drives a lot of companies to gtk (lgpl) and thus increases
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:30:04 -0500 Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This issue is a long and complex one, and I really have no desire to
get into the specifics of it. You and Nathan and Carsten and
On Friday, 25 July 2008, at 01:10:45 (+1000),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
3. This whole mess is a very bad idea. Handling versioned
dependencies is a much, much harder problem than you realize. And
restricting what applications are allowed to peek at a theme's
bits is silly. Just make the
Hey,
I have updated the archive I posted before and provided the same package for
Eet. And again I'd like to ask you to examine them and post any notes if you
have.
Here are they:
http://sionix.pbwiki.com/f/Evil_win32.zip
http://sionix.pbwiki.com/f/Eet_win32.zip
Both should be
On Friday, 25 July 2008, at 00:41:51 (+1000),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
if this is for code going into an existing application and/or
library he is right. code is to be the same license as the existing
tree - if it is to be a different license - it cannot go into the
tree. this is simply
Hi, I'mtrying to copile evil with Visual Studio 2005, but I have some
troubles :)
I think that I have found all files specified in your REAME, in fact I found
all of them in GnuWin32 sourceforge repository.
I have some problem with unistd.h, stdint.h and sys/param.h that are present
in libgw32c
On Thursday, 24 July 2008, at 11:50:52 (-0300),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
I must say I agree with you, I do think the license is something
that matters and LGPL is better for something as EFL.
Better in what ways? Other than simply being able to say we're
LGPL, how does it improve
Hello!
Thank you for interest:).
Sorry for compilation problems, it is my fault.
Till today I had a plug instead of the current fnmatch, and when I placed
normal version of it I didn't try to rebuild the project from scratch, so old
.obj file was used, so I didn't see any errors:). However I
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, 25 July 2008, at 00:41:51 (+1000),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
if this is for code going into an existing application and/or
library he is right. code is to be the same license as the existing
tree - if it is
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2008, at 19:25:42 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
I've learned a lot about the licences reading these mails, and it seems
that the fact is not such licence is a hindrance but such licence can
give
Hi,
I had a similar problem and the main problem was that my dbus daemon wasn't
correctly set up. I also had a similar warning You should just open it...
and after edje_decc'ing it and compiling it again (and moving the new .edj
to the folder) and it worked. I don't know if this is your case
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday, 24 July 2008, at 19:25:42 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
I've learned a lot about the licences reading these mails,
On Friday, 25 July 2008, at 01:53:15 (+0200),
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
Assuming no one using another license ever wants to use that code.
If Peter writes a really badass EWL app and LGPL's or GPL's it,
that code could not be used in E or Evas (unless Peter himself
relicensed it)
On Friday, 25 July 2008, at 01:53:24 (+0200),
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
Well, this thread has of course mutated from its original form, but
has raised several good opinions, and in fact it has turned into
what do we do internally with the efl.
I tried to point people back to your original
On 24-Jul-08, at 5:26 PM, Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
One thing I'd like to see here is the opinion of those that do most
of
the code these days, guys like englebass, dj2, pfritz and raster. You
wrote lots of code already, and continue to do, what do you think
28 matches
Mail list logo
