Ive put together a couple ideas on a wiki entry. Its all concept stuff
at the moment so the sourceforge mailing list doesnt work. I think it
could be a great way to get small teams to collaborate on projects and
then promote E and their own country.
eg. Emulate - EFL based MAME emulator - proudly
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:41:15 +0800 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as you retain this notice you can do whatever you want with
this stuff. If you wish to use this in a commercial product, you must
supply the AUTHOR or AUTHORS with 1 case of beer each.
Which is probably a little closer to
On 07/08/2008, David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:41:15 +0800 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as you retain this notice you can do whatever you want with
this stuff. If you wish to use this in a commercial product, you must
supply the AUTHOR or AUTHORS with 1
As every reader is not in the AUTHOR or AUTHORS, could we
make this licence give a pack of beer to everyone subscribed on
list ?
On 8/7/08, Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/08/2008, David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:41:15 +0800 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:26:11 +0800 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/08/2008, David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:41:15 +0800 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as you retain this notice you can do whatever you want
with this stuff. If you wish to use this
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't tell me that im wrong as i did eina and took the decisions
about it. I have to explain this as this totally wrong. Eina's attempt
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't tell me that im wrong as i did eina and took the decisions
about it. I have to explain
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still don't understand what about the BSD makes it not always free,
you can't steal the code, the free code is always there. Even if raster
wanted to, he could not just up and close the code. He would have to
make a
Actually I thought it was BSD licensed. I didn't expect that Trojan
horse tactic. Only after Vincent has asked me if it is ok for me to
switch to LGPL I realized that i contributed to a proprietary project.
Can you develop why a project using LGPL is a proprietary project ? For
me, a
Vincent Torri schrieb:
Actually I thought it was BSD licensed. I didn't expect that Trojan
horse tactic. Only after Vincent has asked me if it is ok for me to
switch to LGPL I realized that i contributed to a proprietary project.
Can you develop why a project using LGPL is a proprietary
Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still don't understand what about the BSD makes it not always free,
you can't steal the code, the free code is always there. Even if raster
wanted to, he could not just up and close the code.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some people don't want their code forked off and closed away and want
all contributions to come back. This is the difference.
This sounds a lot like having your cake and eating it too heh. LGPL only
stops the company
Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some people don't want their code forked off and closed away and want
all contributions to come back. This is the difference.
This sounds a lot like having your cake and eating it too
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss anyway.
we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
here's how it will go:
1. existing libs. the LGPL crowd - RESPECT the licenses already used.
Attached patch allows the tclock module's tip (that's a popup that
appears when you hover the widget) understand font classes, so you can
easily change the font using Fonts-Advanced dialog.
--
King regards,
Fedor Gusev.
? patch
Index: tclock.edc
Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga schrieb:
As i said too many times, there was edata, this arguments are refered
to edata, not eina, you can think of eina on just the same
conceptually lib but developed from the base code of edata. So i
wasn't expecting developers on eina, i
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2008-08-07 07:10:51 -0700
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
enna http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/enna.log
epdf http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/epdf.log
Hi Fedor,
I'll ask *the* question everyone has on lips : is this code under LGPL or
BSD ?
More seriously, thanx for posting something about code ;-)
On 8/7/08, Fedor Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached patch allows the tclock module's tip (that's a popup that
appears when you hover the
- Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license
is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss
anyway.
we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
here's how it
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Dave Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
Thanks Raster!! finally a POW that respect the others :)
Are you sure that we can (safetly) use LGPL for apps? From what I read
on the gnu site LGPL is exaclty for libs, I didn't find nothing about
using LGPL
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Dave Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
Thanks Raster!! finally a POW that respect the others :)
Are you sure that we can (safetly) use LGPL for apps? From what I read
on the gnu site LGPL is exaclty for
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:57:00 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Dave Andreoli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Thanks Raster!! finally a POW that respect the others :)
Are you sure that we can
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss anyway.
we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
here's how it will go:
1. existing libs. the
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : mekius
Project : e_modules
Module : tclock
Dir : e_modules/tclock
Modified Files:
tclock.edc
Log Message:
Patch from ptomaine, my awesome GSOC student :), to make the popup use font
classes.
Thanks
Christopher Michael wrote:
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : mekius
Project : e_modules
Module : tclock
Dir : e_modules/tclock
Modified Files:
tclock.edc
Log Message:
Patch from ptomaine, my awesome GSOC student :), to make the popup use
Nick Hughart wrote:
Christopher Michael wrote:
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : mekius
Project : e_modules
Module : tclock
Dir : e_modules/tclock
Modified Files:
tclock.edc
Log Message:
Patch from ptomaine, my awesome GSOC student :), to
Christopher Michael wrote:
Nick Hughart wrote:
Christopher Michael wrote:
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : mekius
Project : e_modules
Module : tclock
Dir : e_modules/tclock
Modified Files:
tclock.edc
Log Message:
Patch from ptomaine, my
Carsten wrote:
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss anyway.
we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
That's no doubt true as a rule on any given project, but
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Carsten wrote:
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss anyway.
we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
That's no doubt true as a rule
Nick wrote:
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Carsten wrote:
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license
is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss
anyway.
we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
That's no doubt
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Nick wrote:
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Carsten wrote:
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football.
license is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are
oss anyway.
we're squabbling about strawberry vs chocolate.
Nick Hughart wrote:
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Nick wrote:
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Carsten wrote:
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football.
license is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are
oss anyway.
we're squabbling about strawberry vs
Am Samstag 02 August 2008 02:52:08 schrieb Carsten Haitzler:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 08:25:17 +0800 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
seems there's a few votes for keep of embryo. i'm going to just monitor the
sentiment here - i'm agnostic really - though edje needs a LOT better
scripting support.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Dave Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football. license
is not a
reason one way or another for success or failure if licenses are oss
An we've already heard your arguments, case closed now get to work!
We've already lost time, members and devs due to this ridiculous debate.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carsten wrote:
ok. enough of the squabbling. e is not a political football.
35 matches
Mail list logo
