On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:32:16 +0200 "Kim Woelders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:42:19 +0200, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 15:20:35 (-0300),
> > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >
> ...
> >> 2 - bit pointless to keep .
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:42:19 +0200, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 15:20:35 (-0300),
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
...
>> 2 - bit pointless to keep .cvsignore, let's remove them altogether?
>
> Subversion supports both. Personally I like the fi
Hi guys,
I did some work on wiki to move CVS to SVN and bugzilla to trac, it's
far from complete, so if you want to help...
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-220
On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 15:20:35 (-0300),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> 1 - reply-all to enlightenment-svn lacks enlightenment-devel
Fixed.
> 2 - bit pointless to keep .cvsignore, let's remove them altogether?
Subversion supports both. Personally I like the files way better than
the
2 things:
1 - reply-all to enlightenment-svn lacks enlightenment-devel
2 - bit pointless to keep .cvsignore, let's remove them altogether?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: kwo
> Date: 2008-08-18 11:04:11 -0700 (Mon, 18 Aug 2008)
> New Revision:
Dmitriy Mazovka wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Seems there is a problem in
>
> ef_icon_theme.c:590
>
> if (!strcmp(p, ".png") || !strcmp(p, ".xpm"))
> {
> *p = '\0';
>
> p = strrchr(file, '/');
> if (p) p++;
> if (p) ecore_hash_set(icons, str
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So here is a little patch that signature support to eet. It append
> at the end of a classic eet file a signature and the public x509
> certificate in der format. This change doesn't break file
> compatibility as the signatu
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to make it clear what I think about this: This kind of thing is
> something that really needs to be done, one way or another. :)
>
> Some time back, I thought about having the edje recalc function called
> by s
