Hey,
CFLAGS: -O3
LDFLAGS: -Wl,-s
with amalgamation, the size of the .so is 141316
without, it is 142216
is it normal ?
Vincent
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial.
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote :
Is the following appropriate?
-
Subject: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball
autogen.sh is used by the debian packaging so it seems
appropriate to include it in
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
Hey,
CFLAGS: -O3
LDFLAGS: -Wl,-s
with amalgamation, the size of the .so is 141316
without, it is 142216
is it normal ?
I mean, such a small difference in size
Vincent
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote :
Is the following appropriate?
-
Subject: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball
autogen.sh is used by the debian packaging
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:52:39PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
- ultra-dirty hack to remove extra pointer. The hack bases on the
fact that we just use -last from the first node, that always have the
-prev == NULL. So we could have the first -prev == -last, but how
to know it's
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
Hey,
CFLAGS: -O3
LDFLAGS: -Wl,-s
with amalgamation, the size of the .so is 141316
without, it is 142216
is it normal ?
I mean, such a small difference in size
i'm
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Peter Wehrfritz peter.wehrfr...@web.de wrote:
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
Hey,
CFLAGS: -O3
LDFLAGS: -Wl,-s
with amalgamation, the
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
Hey,
CFLAGS: -O3
LDFLAGS: -Wl,-s
with amalgamation, the size of the .so is 141316
without, it is 142216
is it normal ?
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Ivan Briano wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Vincent Torrivto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Modified: trunk/eina/src/include/eina_inlist.h
===
---
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Vincent Torrivto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Modified: trunk/eina/src/include/eina_inlist.h
===
--- trunk/eina/src/include/eina_inlist.h 2009-09-09
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote :
Is the following appropriate?
-
Subject: Add autogen.sh to dist tarball
autogen.sh is
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:50:04 +1000 Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au said:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote :
Is the following appropriate?
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:52:39 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
you've already put my word in on this. i go the accounting way. 1. it is
consistent with eina_list. 2. can be extended beyond last and include count and
many other things. 3. doesn't change inlist struct size
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:46:54AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:50:04 +1000 Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au said:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote :
Is the following appropriate?
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said:
you won't like this but e_remote and e's ipc are scheduled for death
(removal). 1. we have a dbu api already for e, 2. this includes the core set of
ops needed, 3. it's expandable by modules. the maintenance of
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:54:01 +1000 Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au said:
actually. alibin is wrong (sorry!) autogen's do get packaged. look at
existing efl. we put it in so if u get a tarball u CAN easily modify the
configure.ac, Makefile.am's etc. and re-generate the autofoo. the script
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:53:17AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:52:39 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
you've already put my word in on this. i go the accounting way. 1. it is
consistent with eina_list. 2. can be extended beyond last and
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:19:53 +1000 Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au said:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:53:17AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:52:39 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
you've already put my word in on this. i go the accounting
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 21:15:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said:
you won't like this but e_remote and e's ipc are scheduled for death
(removal). 1. we have a dbu api already for e, 2. this includes the core
set of ops
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:04:35 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said:
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 21:15:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said:
you won't like this but e_remote and e's ipc are scheduled for death
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 22:17:48 you wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:04:35 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said:
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 21:15:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com
said:
you won't like this
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:53:17 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
i've sen this game played before (using high order bits) and then it
com crashing down on peoples heads when suddenly those used bits
become relevant.
Microsoft BASIC for the Amiga I'll bet. lol
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:02:19 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:53:17 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
i've sen this game played before (using high order bits) and then it
com crashing down on peoples heads when suddenly
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:50:04 +1000 Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au said:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:30:24AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:24 +1000, Simon Horman wrote :
Is the following appropriate?
As reported in track ticket 377 (amongst other things), eet seems
to fail to build (on Debian).
# svn checkout FOO/eet
# cd eet
# ./autogen.sh
# make
[snip]
libtool: link: gcc -std=gnu99 -Wall -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe
-Wl,--as-needed -o .libs/eet eet-eet_main.o
25 matches
Mail list logo