Re: [E-devel] FW: FW: FW: FW: FW: FW: Propose a Eina_Path

2016-11-20 Thread Christopher Michael
On 11/20/2016 09:04 PM, Hermet Park wrote: > Make sense to me. > > If no one objects to efl_gfx_path, I will start with the conclusion soon. > +1 dh > -Original Message- > From: "Cedric BAIL" > To: "Enlightenment developer

Re: [E-devel] FW: FW: FW: FW: FW: FW: Propose a Eina_Path

2016-11-20 Thread Hermet Park
Make sense to me. If no one objects to efl_gfx_path, I will start with the conclusion soon. -Original Message- From: "Cedric BAIL" To: "Enlightenment developer list"; Cc: Sent: 2016-11-18 (금) 04:39:09 Subject: Re:

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] Ecore_Getopt STORE_DEF_* is strange

2016-11-20 Thread Jean Guyomarc'h
pong, yeah sorry, I should have answered earlier but was pre-empted by other things. Maybe I didn't understand correctly what you meant, but adding a new field in Ecore_Getopt_Desc_Arg_Requirement (which btw, I don't see how it would be ORed, as nothing in this enum can be meaningfully OR'ed,