Re: [E-devel] Eterm and utf8

2009-02-20 Thread Kim Woelders
Sorry about that. - It should be possible to send patch attachments to this list. - I'm not the biggest fan of t...@$! around here. - It seems I got the patch sneaked through now. /Kim On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:21:04 +0100, Toma tomha...@gmail.com wrote: Patch was not included in the email.

Re: [E-devel] Eterm and utf8

2009-02-20 Thread Peter Wehrfritz
Kim Woelders schrieb: Hello, It is annoying that Eterm doesn't handle utf8. Here is a half-baked patch that might inspire somebody (Michael? :) ) to do it properly. Or maybe one gsoc student :). Beware! This patch breaks things in non-utf8 locales, probably doesn't work on big-endian

Re: [E-devel] Eterm and utf8

2009-02-20 Thread Kim Woelders
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:09:30 +0100, Peter Wehrfritz peter.wehrfr...@web.de wrote: Kim Woelders schrieb: Hello, It is annoying that Eterm doesn't handle utf8. Here is a half-baked patch that might inspire somebody (Michael? :) ) to do it properly. Or maybe one gsoc student :). Beware!

Re: [E-devel] Eterm and utf8

2009-02-20 Thread Peter Wehrfritz
Kim Woelders schrieb: Yes. UCS-2 is used as internal encoding in this patch. It is what I found all in all seemed to give best results. It might be considered to use UCS-2BE internally to avoid some byte swapping, but I got in trouble with that somewhere. I have a similar patch where the

Re: [E-devel] Eterm and utf8

2009-02-19 Thread Toma
Patch was not included in the email. Might be best to create a bug on trac.enlightenment.org/e/ and attach the patch. There may already be a bug open for UTF8 support... -Toma. 2009/2/20 Kim Woelders k...@woelders.dk: Hello, It is annoying that Eterm doesn't handle utf8. Here is a half-baked