On 06/11/13 00:35, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
n On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
That is not going to change.
The first and most important reason is that we are *NOT* going to break API
no matter how right you are.
OK. Can't really argue with that.
Hello,
Both eina_inlist_prepend_relative and eina_list_prepend_relative_list
takes three arguments: list, data and relative. If relative is NULL,
both execute the non-relative version: eina_inlist_prepend and
eina_list_prepend.
This means that there's no way to make eina_inlist_prepend_relative
That is not going to change.
The first and most important reason is that we are *NOT* going to break API
no matter how right you are.
The second reason is that we also have append_relative and having two
functions that do the same would be redundant.
The third reason is quite subjective, and
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:23:42 -0200 Felipe Magno de Almeida
felipe.m.alme...@gmail.com said:
there is the other view that appeanding/prepending relative TO something.. if
something is NULL.. then that something does not exist, so calling these calles
with NULL as relative is silly. the behavior is
n On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Tom Hacohen t...@stosb.com wrote:
That is not going to change.
The first and most important reason is that we are *NOT* going to break API
no matter how right you are.
OK. Can't really argue with that. Though I don't really see how an application
that
