Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Patch from Thanatermesis which adds more comments to the skeleton module.
Still needs more filled in yet, but no time right now.
Guys, why don't you take
Sounds very good :), If anybody is interessed on write it maybe can see
useful the templates from emodule-creator, this is just a kind of
script-replace system under base codes, nothing very powerful but very handy
:)
http://us.repository.elive-systems.com/pool/efl/e/emodule-creator/
You should
On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:39:49 -0500 Christopher Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
Dave Andreoli wrote:
- Christopher Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
It is the proper fix. If we don't want to delete the config then there
is no need to use _gc_id_del.
dh
Yes, I
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 06:39:49PM -0500, Christopher Michael wrote:
So I get ids like 'modulename.1226243030,874566' and I never get two equal
id.
What do you think?
Seems more than adequate for randomness.
Just use a normal random number then. It is not like even rand48() will
be
yes, better now :)
Dave
- Enlightenment SVN [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Log:
Proper fix for not using _gc_id_del.
Author: devilhorns
Date: 2008-11-08 22:50:49 -0800 (Sat, 08 Nov 2008)
New Revision: 37558
Modified:
I reply to myself... changed idea :)
I'm not so sure that this is the proper fix, I think we need the id_del()
function, it's not so good to keep the config of every module forever.
Maybe the real problem is that E should not call id_del() when just a
gc_shutdown()
is needed is there a
It is the proper fix. If we don't want to delete the config then there
is no need to use _gc_id_del.
dh
Dave Andreoli wrote:
I reply to myself... changed idea :)
I'm not so sure that this is the proper fix, I think we need the id_del()
function, it's not so good to keep the config of
- Christopher Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
It is the proper fix. If we don't want to delete the config then there
is no need to use _gc_id_del.
dh
Yes, I know...I mean, we really want to keep all the configs for all
module ever loaded? It seems to me more a workaround to the
Dave Andreoli wrote:
- Christopher Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
It is the proper fix. If we don't want to delete the config then there
is no need to use _gc_id_del.
dh
Yes, I know...I mean, we really want to keep all the configs for all
module ever loaded? It seems to me
