On 12/17/2010 03:30 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
>> Log:
>> only check errno if num< 0
>>
>> Author: englebass
>> Date: 2010-12-17 04:09:14 -0800 (Fri, 17 Dec 2010)
>> New Revision: 55611
>> Trac: http://trac.enl
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> only check errno if num < 0
>
> Author: englebass
> Date: 2010-12-17 04:09:14 -0800 (Fri, 17 Dec 2010)
> New Revision: 55611
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/55611
>
> Modified:
> trunk/ecor
On 12/17/2010 10:59 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
>> Log:
>> don't accept 0 return
>
> You should not look at errno in the case of num == 0. It's not
> defined. When read == 0, that means that the connection is now closed
> and next read will
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> don't accept 0 return
You should not look at errno in the case of num == 0. It's not
defined. When read == 0, that means that the connection is now closed
and next read will return < 0. But read == 0 is not an error case and
errno
Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
> Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> make clang happy
>> Author: englebass
>> Date: 2010-01-14 15:47:26 -0800 (Thu, 14 Jan 2010)
>> New Revision: 45146
>>
>> Modified:
>> trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con.c
>>
>> Modified: trunk/ecore/src/lib/ec
Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> make clang happy
> Author: englebass
> Date: 2010-01-14 15:47:26 -0800 (Thu, 14 Jan 2010)
> New Revision: 45146
>
> Modified:
> trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con.c
>
> Modified: trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con.c
> ==
