On Thursday, 19 October 2006, at 10:44:13 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
As I understand both the ICCCM
(http://tronche.com/gui/x/icccm/sec-2.html) and JWZ's X selection
page (http://www.jwz.org/doc/x-cut-and-paste.html), a request
bearing the TARGETS atom is a request not for the
On Saturday, 14 October 2006, at 01:56:55 (-0400),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
selection_send() looks like it could use some calls to D_SELECT()
... otherwise it doesnt look like it gets called at all
True :)
in my testing over here, every paste that works involves
selection_send() doing
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:54:36 -0400 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Saturday, 14 October 2006, at 01:56:55 (-0400),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
selection_send() looks like it could use some calls to D_SELECT()
... otherwise it doesnt look like it gets called at all
True :)
I concur. I can totally remove the if (...PROP_SELECTION_TARGETS) section,
configure with --enable-multi-charset, and everything seems to work fine.
Even without --enable-multi-charset, if you remove the #define/#endif
statements, everything seems to work. Since I'm not that familiar with X, I
On Saturday, 07 October 2006, at 15:53:42 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
it's very probably a 64bit bug. probably to do with properties as x
likes to use long for datatypes even though the wire protocol will
only ever support 32bits for that type. i suspect its a int vs long
on 64bit bug.
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 23:30:09 -0400 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Friday 06 October 2006 15:17, Michael Jennings wrote:
this has been reported a few times in the past, and it isnt a gcc4 issue
I'm told it works on gcc3.
that's nice ... i'm telling you ive built an
On Thursday 05 October 2006 15:20, Michael Jennings wrote:
If it ONLY happens on x86_64 and it ONLY happens with gcc 4, don't you
think that sounds like a gcc bug? I sure do.
this has been reported a few times in the past, and it isnt a gcc4 issue
i know this fails for me on my amd64
On Friday 06 October 2006 15:06, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i know this fails for me on my amd64 machines, i'll see if it fails on my
x86 32bit ...
copying pasting works for me on my x86
-mike
pgplg5ElUbfjo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday, 06 October 2006, at 15:06:10 (-0400),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
this has been reported a few times in the past, and it isnt a gcc4 issue
I'm told it works on gcc3.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/
On Friday 06 October 2006 15:17, Michael Jennings wrote:
this has been reported a few times in the past, and it isnt a gcc4 issue
I'm told it works on gcc3.
that's nice ... i'm telling you ive built an amd64/gcc-3.4.x system and it
breaks ... people have been reporting this before gcc-4
All,
Several gentoo (and a suse) users have been having trouble with Eterm
specifically with it's interface with xselection. We think that we have
narrowed it down to x86_64 with gcc4. The behavior is that you can
cut/paste within a select group of type of windows (eterms, xterms, firefox,
All,
Several gentoo (and a suse) users have been having trouble with Eterm
specifically with it's interface with xselection. We think that we have
narrowed it down to x86_64 with gcc4. The behavior is that you can
cut/paste within a select group of type of windows (eterms, xterms, firefox,
On Tuesday, 03 October 2006, at 08:42:34 (-0400),
Dan Gregory wrote:
Several gentoo (and a suse) users have been having trouble with Eterm
specifically with it's interface with xselection. We think that we have
narrowed it down to x86_64 with gcc4. The behavior is that you can
cut/paste
13 matches
Mail list logo
