Re: [E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-15 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Christopher Michael wrote: Hey Seb, Just looking through configure.in I wondered why you didn't use: AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) instead of the: edje_cc=$(pkg-config --variable=prefix edje)/bin/edje_cc it is maybe possible that $(pkg-config

Re: [E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-15 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With edje_cc=$(pkg-config --variable=prefix edje)/bin/edje_cc you get the full path, so it will be executable anyway. ha, indeed :) With AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) edje_cc must be in the path, which is possible that it isn't.

Re: [E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-15 Thread sebastid
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Christopher Michael wrote: Hey Seb, Just looking through configure.in I wondered why you didn't use: AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) instead of the: edje_cc=$(pkg-config --variable=prefix edje)/bin/edje_cc it is maybe possible that $(pkg-config

Re: [E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-15 Thread sebastid
Hey Seb, Just looking through configure.in I wondered why you didn't use: AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) instead of the: edje_cc=$(pkg-config --variable=prefix edje)/bin/edje_cc that is there currently. Because the latter was used in the first file I encountered, and I just

Re: [E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-15 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) schreef: On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0100 Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: If you want to be nice to cross-compilation environments, AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) edje_cc is more

Re: [E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-15 Thread Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
If you want to be nice to cross-compilation environments, AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) edje_cc is more advisable than edje_cc=$(pkg-config --variable=prefix edje)/bin/edje_cc since in the latter case it would probably point to the cross-compiled edje_cc which we surely can't run during

Re: [E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-15 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0100 Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: If you want to be nice to cross-compilation environments, AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) edje_cc is more advisable than edje_cc=$(pkg-config --variable=prefix edje)/bin/edje_cc since in the

Re: [E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-15 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:15:32 +0100 Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) schreef: On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0100 Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: If you want to be nice to

Re: [E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-15 Thread Christopher Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Seb, Just looking through configure.in I wondered why you didn't use: AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) instead of the: edje_cc=$(pkg-config --variable=prefix edje)/bin/edje_cc that is there currently. Because the latter was used in the first file

Re: [E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0100 Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer If you want to be nice to cross-compilation environments, AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) edje_cc is more advisable than edje_cc=$(pkg-config --variable=prefix

[E-devel] Recent e_modules configure.in changes

2007-11-14 Thread Christopher Michael
Hey Seb, Just looking through configure.in I wondered why you didn't use: AC_PATH_PROG(EDJE_CC, edje_cc, , $PATH) instead of the: edje_cc=$(pkg-config --variable=prefix edje)/bin/edje_cc that is there currently. dh -