It looks like there are 2(+) commits with this same commit message, at
least 2 of which are just adding and removing this section and not actually
doing what the commit describes?

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:59 AM Christopher Michael <devilho...@comcast.net>
wrote:

> devilhorns pushed a commit to branch feature/wayland/multioutput.
>
>
> http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=06f6a9a1a945934370375f133dde4c58cd07e21e
>
> commit 06f6a9a1a945934370375f133dde4c58cd07e21e
> Author: Chris Michael <cp.mich...@samsung.com>
> Date:   Thu Mar 29 09:17:52 2018 -0400
>
>     ecore-evas-drm: Initial work on getting ecore_evas_drm to do
>     multi-output
>
>     This patch adds support for getting ecore_evas_drm to function with
>     more than one output. Both clone & extended mode should work with
>     this, however please Note that rotation will be broken until future
>     patches implement rotation per-output.
>
>     @feature
> ---
>  src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/drm/ecore_evas_drm.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/drm/ecore_evas_drm.c
> b/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/drm/ecore_evas_drm.c
> index 4a2859908a..cacd052b57 100644
> --- a/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/drm/ecore_evas_drm.c
> +++ b/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/drm/ecore_evas_drm.c
> @@ -281,9 +281,6 @@ _drm_rotation_do(Ecore_Evas *ee, int rotation, int
> resize)
>
>     if (!found) return;
>
> -   /* output = eina_list_nth(edata->outputs, 0); */
> -   /* if (!output) return; */
> -
>     rotations = ecore_drm2_output_supported_rotations_get(output);
>     if (rotations >= 0)
>       {
>
> --
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to