Hello everybody,
The reason for my inactivity is a combination of moving to a new house and a
broken monitor.
I revised all the comments of the EDC Reference and added new ones.
The EDC Reference are around 80% complete, I won't be able of completing them
any time soon (moving yet again), I
Yea I moved some functions around, the reason is that the doxygen aliases I
used to create the reference table assume the format:
block1
properties of block1
block2
properties of block2
And the function definitions for color_class, color, color2 and color3,
(description block) are
Ah, ok. I didn't notice that they were moved in the original patch, hard
to pick out with all the other changes in there.
I don't see any reason why this can't get committed.
dan
andres wrote:
Yea I moved some functions around, the reason is that the doxygen aliases I
used to create the
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:32:35 -0300 andres [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
As some of you might know I'm writting a EDC reference as Doxygen formmated
comments directly into edje_cc_handlers.c
My theory is that having the reference flowing along the code will ease
mantienance of the reference
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:32:35 -0300 andres [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
As some of you might know I'm writting a EDC reference as Doxygen formmated
comments directly into edje_cc_handlers.c
My theory is that having the reference flowing along the
Did you remove collections.group.parts.part.description.color_class,
color, color2, color3 on purpose? If so, what's the reasoning behind
this? (lines 139-142 and 1620 - 1694)
dan
On 13-Nov-07, at 1:08 AM, Ben Rockwood wrote:
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, dan sinclair wrote:
Did you remove collections.group.parts.part.description.color_class,
color, color2, color3 on purpose? If so, what's the reasoning behind
this? (lines 139-142 and 1620 - 1694)
If I'm not mistaken, they are moved (lines 128 and 1209)
maybe the patch
On Nov 11, 2007 4:32 PM, andres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As some of you might know I'm writting a EDC reference as Doxygen formmated
comments directly into edje_cc_handlers.c
My theory is that having the reference flowing along the code will ease
mantienance of the reference as the Edje
