Hello. On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 10:45, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: > Now that we have fewer packages to deal with, wouldn't it be better to use > the 'nano' version (something like 1.8.X.90) for pre-releases? Then when > it is time bump it to X+1 and remove the nano.
The idea itself is interesting. It would be nice to have some version for pre-releases without spoiling the minor version. One problem I see is that once we have a set of tarballs we are happy with we would still need to another commit changing the version, generating new tarballs and uploading them again. While right now I would just move them over to the right folder. More work versus clearer structure and message. I need to think about it. I might try it out for the next stable release and see how it works. Thanks for bringing this up. regards Stefan Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Enlightenment-release mailing list Enlightenment-release@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-release
