On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:32:07 +0100, Andreas Volz wrote
> I don't think it's a lib problem. It's probably a bug in
> e16menuedit2. Are you uning the current CVS source? Is the ECONFDIR
> env variable set
> (should be done automaticly)? Perhaps try parameter --menus to force
> new menu structure.
Am Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:37:48 +0100 schrieb jacinto calvo sintes:
> I've let E make a new .e16/ dir with all new confs and regenerated
> menus, after so, I've build e16menuedit2 and installed fine, but it
> can't startup. It keeps giving me segmentation fault as soon as he
> ends reading menu.file
jacinto calvo sintes wrote:
I've build again and now it only happens when i iconify any app and
at the iconbox settings is activated in the icon image display policy
the first option (Snapshot Windows, Use app icon, Use Enlightenment
icon). If i use any of the 2 other options works fine
This is a b
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:15:27 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote
> jacinto wrote:
> > nearly all works fine, except when i try to minimize a window, makes
> > E restart, worked once with no effects to it, but only worked once,
> > i'm not sure if it's minimize or iconbox, becouse iconbox made also
> > funny
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:31:06 +0100, Andreas Volz wrote
> Am Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:10:00 +0100 schrieb jacinto calvo sintes:
> You should use the e16menuedit2 CVS source for this. Do not use
> 0.0.1, because it doesn't have support for new menu structure. The
> old e16menuedit has also no support f
jacinto calvo sintes wrote:
Hi, i've been playing with e16.8 and i'll tell my impressions:
nearly all works fine, except when i try to minimize a window, makes
E restart, worked once with no effects to it, but only worked once,
i'm not sure if it's minimize or iconbox, becouse iconbox made also
fun
Am Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:10:00 +0100 schrieb jacinto calvo sintes:
> Also as it's been told before, keybindings doesn't work correctly and
> still don't know how to insert e16menuedit or e16keyedit and make them
> work with e16.8
You should use the e16menuedit2 CVS source for this. Do not use 0.0.1
Hi, i've been playing with e16.8 and i'll tell my impressions:
nearly all works fine, except when i try to minimize a window, makes E
restart, worked once with no effects to it, but only worked once, i'm not sure
if it's minimize or iconbox, becouse iconbox made also funny things.
When i logout f
I'll favor "look good" over "physically correct" in this case :)
The code removal as suggested doesn't fix the problem entirely, as you
may have seen, but can speed up shadow image calculations if the region
isn't used anyway.
The proper fix involves properly repainting the window stack taking into
The changes look about right.
Could you please send a regular patch? That would make it *quite*
a bit easier for me :)
Just do something like
/e16/e$ cvs -z3 dif -u > remember-shadow.patch
and send me remember-shadow.patch as an attachment.
The noshadow option could be added to the WINOPS_MENU in
c
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:10:09 +0100
phriedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I searched e's code today for doing that, but couldn't really found it,
> at least my hacks didn't work.
To answer my own mail:
I could get it working, the NOSHADOW-option now appears in the window's
remember-dialog
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:28:15 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> Good point. I have added a quick and dirty "noshadow" op.
> This setting is not remembered for now, and shading will have to be
> disabled and enabled for it to take effect (or resize the window).
Could we have
Actually, if you want it to be physically correct, the shadow should
be seen through a transparent window. The question here is, would it
look pretier without the square part of the shadow. Then again, if it
should be removed, then it should be totally removed, since the center
square part will nev
Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
kwo, this is a patch that someone created for xcompmgr, that's
supposed to de-uglify shadows for translucent windows. basically, the
shadow opacity is modified by a coefficient, dependant on the window
opacity. that way translucent windows look nice, not like dirty snow
:).
kwo, this is a patch that someone created for xcompmgr, that's
supposed to de-uglify shadows for translucent windows. basically, the
shadow opacity is modified by a coefficient, dependant on the window
opacity. that way translucent windows look nice, not like dirty snow
:). Can you implement it int
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:58:34 +0100
phriedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] Where can I find this?
Sorry, stupid question...found it.
Nice!
Friedrich
pgpsR9PfX4olJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:28:15 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] I have added a quick and dirty "noshadow" op.
Excellent! Where can I find this?
Thanks,
Friedrich
pgp5k2DS7LQDT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:21:27 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - moving a window to an other virtual screen still isn't working
> >
> Should be fixed in CVS.
Yes it is, thanks.
How can I close in bugtracker, because I'm just reporter and seem not be
able to close this bug-repor
phriedrich wrote:
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:21:27 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
However, I'm not sure it should be available as a general
window option.
Why not?
But would be enough to have it available from eesh.
It's important for having (pseudo-)transparent, borderless window
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:21:27 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> However, I'm not sure it should be available as a general
> window option.
Why not?
But would be enough to have it available from eesh.
It's important for having (pseudo-)transparent, borderless windows
directly on
phriedrich wrote:
Only two small things still:
- I have a transparent, borderless Iconbox, with unsharp shadow there's
allways a shadow as big as the box is, with hard shadows there's none what
looks much better in this case.
Maybe there should be an option to have a certain window without shadows
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:38:29 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try "eesh set compmgr.mode 1".
Many thanks, that worked.
Only two small things still:
- I have a transparent, borderless Iconbox, with unsharp shadow there's
allways a shadow as big as the box is, with hard shadows the
phriedrich wrote:
Hi,
I can't enable the internal composite manager in todays CVS, it just does
nothing. Even when trying that from eesh with "cm start" it isn't working
and "cm" shows always on="0".
I started xcompmgr to see if it's working at least, and thats ok (but have
some faults preventing m
Hi,
I can't enable the internal composite manager in todays CVS, it just does
nothing. Even when trying that from eesh with "cm start" it isn't working
and "cm" shows always on="0".
I started xcompmgr to see if it's working at least, and thats ok (but have
some faults preventing me to use it with
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:51:28 +0200
Bradley Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have a NVIDIA card (and are using the nvidia module and not nv) you
> probably want:
>
> Option "AllowGLXWithComposite" "True"
>
> Otherwise GLX is disabled when Composite is enabled.
That's what th
Thanks for the precision... I have an ATI laptop chipset though.
Using the kernel driver is working fine for me, although 3D performance
is less than adequate... But what else is there to expect from a laptop?
Thanks though,
Cheers
John
Bradley Reed wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 13:36:23 -0800
Jonat
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 13:36:23 -0800
Jonathan Charnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bradley Reed wrote:
> >
> >Ah, I didn't have composite enabled in xorg.conf. I'll give it a try.
> >
> >
> trick question, how/where do you enable composite in xorg.conf?
> probably belongs in an xorg list, but I'
On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 13:36 -0800, Jonathan Charnas wrote:
> trick question, how/where do you enable composite in xorg.conf?
> probably belongs in an xorg list, but I'm not subscribed to those...
> Thanks
> John
Section "Extensions"
...
Option "Composite" "Enable"
EndSection
I have it right a
Bradley Reed wrote:
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 18:41:58 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bradley Reed wrote:
Sylpheed hung, I tried to close it, then kill it, then I kill -9'd it. ps
showed that it was no longer running, but unfortunately e16 still saw it.
I could still move the dead
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 18:41:58 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bradley Reed wrote:
> > Sylpheed hung, I tried to close it, then kill it, then I kill -9'd it. ps
> > showed that it was no longer running, but unfortunately e16 still saw it.
> > I could still move the dead window a
Bradley Reed wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:06:12 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
0.16.8 contains (at least internally) major changes wrt. 0.16.7.
I believe it is quite stable, but there may well be some bugs around.
I believe I may have hit one, but I'm not quite sure how to describe
Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
There's this really weird bug with Virtual Desktops and sliding.
When there are any windows on the screen, the sliding is ungodly slow,
nothing like the settings at all. It's probably trying to redraw the
windows while sliding or something.
Is this with composite enabled
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:06:12 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In case there still are a few out there using e16 :)
I'm sure there are a LOT of us still using e16. :)
> 0.16.8 contains (at least internally) major changes wrt. 0.16.7.
> I believe it is quite stable, but there
There's this really weird bug with Virtual Desktops and sliding.
When there are any windows on the screen, the sliding is ungodly slow,
nothing like the settings at all. It's probably trying to redraw the
windows while sliding or something.
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:06:12 +0100, Kim Woelders <[EMA
errr, here's a small patch for the .po file that fixes a few things
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:14:42 +0100, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
> > also, kim, an updated bg.po file is inside, for you to put in the
> > repository.
> >
> Thanks, committed.
>
> > thirdl
Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
also, kim, an updated bg.po file is inside, for you to put in the repository.
Thanks, committed.
thirdly, where do I put the keybindings.cfg file in the .e16 directory
so it's used? putting it in the share/e16 folder everytime E is
installed is bad karma!
keybindings.cfg is
Ah, got it. Should be fixed now.
/Kim
Kim Woelders wrote:
Adrien Tougas wrote:
I'm having a small problem with theme backgrounds overriding my
background choices, whether I have the "Background overrides theme"
check box checked or un-checked in the Desktop Background Settings
panel.
Hmm.. Works fo
phriedrich wrote:
Really nice features, especially the config-dir clean-ups are cool, the
only sad thing is that they're done now, just before e17 become usable,
and not years before ;-)
Yeah, time is probably running out on e16. Maybe some of the things can
be re-used in e1x :)
But I have some p
Adrien Tougas wrote:
I'm having a small problem with theme backgrounds overriding my
background choices, whether I have the "Background overrides theme"
check box checked or un-checked in the Desktop Background Settings
panel.
Hmm.. Works for me.
/Kim
---
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:06:12 +0100
Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0.16.8 contains (at least internally) major changes wrt. 0.16.7.
> I believe it is quite stable, but there may well be some bugs around.
>
> The major new features are:
> - Name, configuration path, and install path chan
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 23:06 +0100, Kim Woelders wrote:
> In case there still are a few out there using e16 :)
>
> I have been messing around with a number of things, until now in a
> separate CVS branch. This has now been merged into the trunk.
>
> 0.16.8 contains (at least internally) major chan
In case there still are a few out there using e16 :)
I have been messing around with a number of things, until now in a
separate CVS branch. This has now been merged into the trunk.
0.16.8 contains (at least internally) major changes wrt. 0.16.7.
I believe it is quite stable, but there may well be
42 matches
Mail list logo
