Re: [e-users] e17 on dbus-daemon crash

2010-11-12 Thread hannes.janet...@gmail.com
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:41 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: > On 11/12/2010 10:43 AM, David Seikel wrote: >> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:27:10 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) >>  wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:29 +0800 P Purkayastha >>> said: I am not using any kind of composite. Maybe

Re: [e-users] e17 on dbus-daemon crash

2010-11-12 Thread P Purkayastha
On 11/12/2010 10:43 AM, David Seikel wrote: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:27:10 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > wrote: > >> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:29 +0800 P Purkayastha >> said: >>> I am not using any kind of composite. Maybe it is not e's fault. >>> Probably one of the many modules from

Re: [e-users] e17 on dbus-daemon crash

2010-11-11 Thread David Seikel
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:27:10 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:29 +0800 P Purkayastha > said: > > > On 11/12/2010 07:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:47:46 +0800 P > > > Purkayastha said: > > >> You were right.

Re: [e-users] e17 on dbus-daemon crash

2010-11-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:29 +0800 P Purkayastha said: > On 11/12/2010 07:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:47:46 +0800 P Purkayastha said: > >> You were right. After unloading itask-ng I did get a segv, but this time > >> I got the WSOD. The bt (attached)

Re: [e-users] e17 on dbus-daemon crash

2010-11-11 Thread P Purkayastha
On 11/12/2010 07:20 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:47:46 +0800 P Purkayastha said: >> You were right. After unloading itask-ng I did get a segv, but this time >> I got the WSOD. The bt (attached) is different, and I am not even sure >> what module this belongs

Re: [e-users] e17 on dbus-daemon crash

2010-11-11 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:47:46 +0800 P Purkayastha said: > On 11/11/2010 01:40 AM, hannes.janet...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:43 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> There were some earlier questions by raster on what happens when > >> dbus-daemon crashes o

Re: [e-users] e17 on dbus-daemon crash

2010-11-11 Thread P Purkayastha
On 11/11/2010 01:40 AM, hannes.janet...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:43 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: Hi, There were some earlier questions by raster on what happens when dbus-daemon crashes or quits while e17 is running. It happened yesterday that dbus-daemon crashed (or quit,

Re: [e-users] e17 on dbus-daemon crash

2010-11-10 Thread hannes.janet...@gmail.com
Hi, On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:43 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: > Hi, > >  There were some earlier questions by raster on what happens when > dbus-daemon crashes or quits while e17 is running. It happened yesterday > that dbus-daemon crashed (or quit, not sure what happened) and here are my > observati

[e-users] e17 on dbus-daemon crash

2010-11-10 Thread P Purkayastha
Hi, There were some earlier questions by raster on what happens when dbus-daemon crashes or quits while e17 is running. It happened yesterday that dbus-daemon crashed (or quit, not sure what happened) and here are my observations: 1. e17 was running quite fine, with no visible problems. 2