Hi,
shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool
feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf
for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E
session the exebuf needs some time to load (here: up to 10sec). While
this wait time E is
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:32:40 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi,
>
> shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool
> feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf
> for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E
>
Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
Rasterman):
> > shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool
> > feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf
> > for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E
> > s
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:51:15 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
> Rasterman):
>
> > > shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool
> > > feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start th
Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 20:44:59 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
Rasterman):
> > > could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just
> > > before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it immediately
> > > first). ? for me exebuf always comes up instantaneously.
> >
> > Sure
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:50:39 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 20:44:59 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
> Rasterman):
>
> > > > could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just
> > > > before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it i
Just for the hell of it, I called Monarch Computer her in Georgia and
talked to them about the possibility of either donating hardware or
reducing the cost for the sake of an open source project.
That being said, I was told that I should send an email to the marketing
department.
It makes sense t
On 03/02/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool
> feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf
> for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E
> session the exebuf needs some tim
Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 23:40:33 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
Rasterman):
> > So do I need to activate something in the kernel and recompile? What
> > should I do?
>
> well it says your kernel doesnt support oprofile! take a guess! :)
Sorry for my stupid questions, but I never used oprofile an
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:32:40 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool
> > feature. More as a simple startin
Pavel Reznicek wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing a little strange behaviour in e16 (pre2 and below,
haven't tried pre3) when moving from one virtual desktop to another
through the edge flip feature.
I've set up focus settings to follow mouse pointer (no matter if
sloppily) and enabled ed
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:54:19 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 23:40:33 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
> Rasterman):
>
> > > So do I need to activate something in the kernel and recompile? What
> > > should I do?
> >
> > well it says your kernel doesnt supp
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:32:40 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > shortly I
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:48:10 -0500 Dusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On 03/02/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool
> > feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf
> > for the first time in an E
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:30:09 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > It used to start up slowly for me to. So I whip out oprofile to
> > test, and now it starts up instantly. Did you f
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:56:27 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:30:09 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> > > It used to start up slowly f
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:28:03 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:56:27 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:30:09 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:50:29 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> unfortrunately thats nopt really in a usable form :( can u do:
> opreport --symbols
Pretty sure this will be useless to. Gotta recompile my kernel to get
kernel symbols I think. I'm currently using t
On 1/30/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PowerEdge 850 (1u): Pentium D Dual core 3.2Ghz 2x1MB L2 Cache, 2GB 667MHz DDRRAM, SATA Raid Controller, 2x250GB SATA 7200rpm Drives, 24x speed CD. Standardnext business day on site warranty support (nothing special) = $2744
Power
19 matches
Mail list logo
