Re: [e-users] Terminology interprets < as >

2016-10-04 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:13:47 -0400 Ross Vandegrift said: > Hi all, > > On one system, terminology is interpreting presses of "<" as if I > pressed ">". Comma is unaffected. No other application does this. > Remote terminology doesn't do it, so I think it must be in the local

Re: [e-users] Terminology interprets < as >

2016-10-04 Thread Boris Faure
On 16-10-04 10:38, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:28:24PM +0100, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > Is "<" rendered as "<", or as ">"? Could you maybe try a different shell > > (I'm just making random suggestions at this point)? > > Keypresses of < are rendered ">". Apps interpret it

Re: [e-users] Terminology interprets < as >

2016-10-04 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:28:24PM +0100, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Is "<" rendered as "<", or as ">"? Could you maybe try a different shell > (I'm just making random suggestions at this point)? Keypresses of < are rendered ">". Apps interpret it as > (shell redirection and less navigation are very

Re: [e-users] Terminology interprets < as >

2016-10-04 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 04/10/16 15:23, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> On one system, terminology is interpreting presses of "<" as if I >>> pressed ">". Comma is unaffected. No other application does this. >>> Remote terminology doesn't do it, so I think

Re: [e-users] Terminology interprets < as >

2016-10-04 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > On one system, terminology is interpreting presses of "<" as if I > > pressed ">". Comma is unaffected. No other application does this. > > Remote terminology doesn't do it, so I think it must be in the local > > config. > > > >

Re: [e-users] Terminology interprets < as >

2016-10-04 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 04/10/16 15:13, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Hi all, > > On one system, terminology is interpreting presses of "<" as if I > pressed ">". Comma is unaffected. No other application does this. > Remote terminology doesn't do it, so I think it must be in the local > config. > > Any ideas on how I

[e-users] Terminology interprets < as >

2016-10-04 Thread Ross Vandegrift
Hi all, On one system, terminology is interpreting presses of "<" as if I pressed ">". Comma is unaffected. No other application does this. Remote terminology doesn't do it, so I think it must be in the local config. Any ideas on how I can track this down? Ross