Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Homepage changed with 60-68 change

2019-07-31 Thread Timo Pietilä
On 29.7.2019 19.59, Mike Kaply wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 6:21 AM Timo Pietilä > wrote: Hello. Couple of things I have noticed and have not been able to figure out how to fix are that when I upgrade from ff60esr to ff68esr it doesn't

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Firefox ESR Offline Patching solution.

2019-07-31 Thread Éric Périard
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Hey Alex, Interesting, but deployment wise, SCCM has legs in every segment of the network. End-user desktops are whitelisted to update from the web using the Firefox maintenance app, however the PAW's are segmented because they are for administration. So PAWs DO

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Firefox ESR Offline Patching solution.

2019-07-31 Thread Mike Kaply
All of our policy stuff is available on Linux (although I'm looking at moving the JSON file to a better location) As far as deployments go, we have Snaps for Firefox and we're actively looking at Flatpak Mike On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:49 AM Paul Kosinski via Enterprise < enterprise@mozilla.org>

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Firefox ESR Offline Patching solution.

2019-07-31 Thread Paul Kosinski via Enterprise
Lot's of the methods these days for configuring Firefox seem to be Windows only. Is Linux Firefox being left out in the cold? On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:56:34 +0200 Alexandre GAUVRIT wrote: > Hi, > > There is also an Open-Source alternative to SCCM which can fulfill > your need, it's WAPT

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Firefox ESR Offline Patching solution.

2019-07-31 Thread Alexandre GAUVRIT
Hi, There is also an Open-Source alternative to SCCM which can fulfill your need, it's WAPT Deployment software. The store provides pre-made Firefox and Firefox ESR packages : https://store.wapt.fr/store/?search=Firefox=popular If your scope of endpoint is out of SCCM scope, it can be a good

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Firefox ESR Offline Patching solution.

2019-07-31 Thread Tanstaafl
On Mon Jul 29 2019 12:37:48 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Mike Kaply wrote: > I have an (very) old post that describes this: > > https://mike.kaply.com/2007/03/26/deploying-firefox-2-within-the-enterprise-part-5/ > > I think some things have change slightly since then (particular the >