> "DL" == Dave Love writes:
DL> In preparing the recipe with the minimal spec to demonstrate, I
DL> realized it's because it doesn't work if you have scl build stuff
DL> installed.
Yep, it explicitly gets out of the way if the SCL stuff is there. This
is to avoid bugs in the SCL macros.
DL
> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> What bug? Sorry we really need to see some actual output and
SJS> problems here to have an idea of what we are trying to tackle.
I think he's referring to the fact that the SCL macros break if you try
to do too much with other macros. I could pro
On 25 March 2016 at 10:46, Dave Love wrote:
> Jason L Tibbitts III writes:
>
>> And I just pulled two random package with EL6 branches, changed %doc to
>> %license in the appropriate places, and built them in mock. Everything
>> came out as expected (no build failures, and the license files are
Jason L Tibbitts III writes:
> And I just pulled two random package with EL6 branches, changed %doc to
> %license in the appropriate places, and built them in mock. Everything
> came out as expected (no build failures, and the license files are in
> with the rest of the documentation).
>
> So I
