[EPEL-devel] intent to retire pam_script from epel5

I doubt anyone is using but as a heads up, I am planning on retiring pam_script from epel5.  If you are using the epel5 package and would like to maintain it just apply for ACLs and I'll hand them over. JT ___ epel-devel mailing list

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs update

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 08/11/2016 07:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 08/11/2016 05:16 AM, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> As some of you may know, nodejs package that is present in >>> EPEL is pretty outdated. The current

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 532 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 295 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 57

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding the devtoolset repo for EPEL builds

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "DJ" == Dave Johansen writes: > > DJ> devtoolset is designed to do all of this and is already done, so it > DJ> seems that the only advantage to putting it in EPEL itself would be >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding the devtoolset repo for EPEL builds

> "DJ" == Dave Johansen writes: DJ> devtoolset is designed to do all of this and is already done, so it DJ> seems that the only advantage to putting it in EPEL itself would be DJ> to reduce the number of repos during build time. So is devtoolset something I get