On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:59:55 -0600
> Dave Johansen wrote:
>
> > I agree that how to handle SCLs can get really mess really fast, but
> > a lot of projects are jumping on the "modern C++" bandwagon and
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 12:52:46 -0400
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 25 August 2016 at 02:14, dani wrote:
> > When I proposed importing gcc-5 to EPEL6 back in 04/2016 (
> >
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:59:55 -0600
Dave Johansen wrote:
> I agree that how to handle SCLs can get really mess really fast, but
> a lot of projects are jumping on the "modern C++" bandwagon and
> allows devtoolset is low risk, easy to do and enables a lot of
> packages to
On 25 August 2016 at 12:49, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 24 August 2016 at 23:59, Dave Johansen wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> I agree that how to handle SCLs can get really mess really fast,
On 25 August 2016 at 02:14, dani wrote:
> When I proposed importing gcc-5 to EPEL6 back in 04/2016 (
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/F5JXEYPKQY77NRBCL4MNUBS3K2YYBBTU/
> ) the response was an unequivocal no, EPEL does
On 24 August 2016 at 23:59, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:43:31 -0600
>> Dave Johansen wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi
On 08/11/2016 05:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/11/2016 05:16 AM, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote:
Hi!
As some of you may know, nodejs package that is present in
EPEL is pretty outdated. The current v0.10 that we have will
go EOL in October and npm (package manager) is already not
maintained.
On 23/08/16 03:48, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Gallagher
>> >
>> Let me (or open a rel-eng ticket) when you want a epel7-nodejs6 side
>> tag to build it into. Will make it easier so you don't need to deal
>> with a billion
On 08/24/2016 11:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I have no idea if there is any interest in this or not. I managed to get the
EPEL7 python34 package to build on EL6 with a few modifications. Is there any
interest in
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
>
> To be completely fair, I don't actually know EPEL policy here. The rule
> is that you can't conflict with RHEL packages, but SRPMs aren't really
> installed the same way as other packages and whether or not they
>
> Which is an annoying bit of process, but it would be quite possible to
> exempt those packages from needing package reviews. It needn't take
> that long.
>
>
Not needing reviews would help, but I wonder how hard it would be to make
them children of python-PACKAGE. The main issue is the SRPM
Definitely, but it runs into the same problem as 3.4 on EL7, the fact that
there are few packages available and adding them when the package already
exists in RHEL requires creating a separate parent package in Fedora pkgdb.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Orion Poplawski
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
535 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
297 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
60
On 08/24/2016 11:38 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I have no idea if there is any interest in this or not. I managed to get the
> EPEL7 python34 package to build on EL6 with a few modifications. Is there any
> interest in supporting this?
>
>
>
> ___
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
805 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
654 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849
sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5
297
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
413 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
407 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
339
When I proposed importing gcc-5 to EPEL6 back in 04/2016 (
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/F5JXEYPKQY77NRBCL4MNUBS3K2YYBBTU/
) the response was an unequivocal no, EPEL does not install to /opt/ ,
so it dies right there.
Now you are
17 matches
Mail list logo