On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 5:05 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
...
> While I agree that we should be very careful with this, I do not
> believe it should be completely off the table.
> I believe it should be permissible with the EPEL Steering Council's
> blessing, but not otherwise.
> Case in point is
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 1:16 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 3:57 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:06:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Consider:
> > >
> > > 1. foo rpm that is in the RHEL baseos. It's not in any module.
> > > Can epel
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 3:57 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:06:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Consider:
> >
> > 1. foo rpm that is in the RHEL baseos. It's not in any module.
> > Can epel make a foo (non default) module that overrides it?
> >
This is safe from a
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:06:32PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Consider:
>
> 1. foo rpm that is in the RHEL baseos. It's not in any module.
> Can epel make a foo (non default) module that overrides it?
>
> 2. foo rpm that is in a RHEL default module.
> Can epel make a foo (non default) module
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 05:09:04PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> So the bottom line is: Prefixed streams should provide a bullet proof
> mitigation. Until DNF gains the ability to obsolete a stream, there will be
> slight risk of creeping out-dated EPEL content into the installation.
A prefix also
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2020-02-26 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the
following:
#meetingname EPEL
#topic
I've subscribed to the bug report, but I've also spoke with Jens Petersen
on IRC and he said it will be available rather soon =)
--
Best regards / S pozdravem,
BSc. Mark Stopka, BBA
mobile: +420 704 373 561
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 3:26 PM Jos Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 08:56:52AM
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 08:56:52AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [...] If you need a set of packages, go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com
> and check to see if there are outstanding bug tickets requesting a
> maintainer to support it in EPEL-8. If there are add your info to that
> ticket,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 08:53, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a specific reason why the Haskell platform is not available
> anymore in EPEL 8 (it was in EPEL 7)? Any ongoing work known to
> eventually support it again?
>
>
We do not automatically branch everything from one release to another.
Hi,
Is there a specific reason why the Haskell platform is not available
anymore in EPEL 8 (it was in EPEL 7)? Any ongoing work known to
eventually support it again?
Thanks,
--
--Jos Vos
--X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Office: +31 20 6938364
--Amsterdam, The Netherlands
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 18:31, Eduardo Kienetz wrote:
>
> It would be my first time maintaining an EPEL package, but if nobody else
> already experienced is willing, I could probably do it with minimal
> supervision/hints to get started :)
> What has been the typical work? If they have git repos
11 matches
Mail list logo
