On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:10 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 06:52:12AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:25 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > >
> > > But that leads me to a question about -devel modules. RHEL delivers some
> > > -devel modules in a CRB repository.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 06:52:12AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:25 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > I can only see a small ambiguity regarding build-only packages that are
> > filtered out of the module. I believe the rule about the module names should
> > not apply for these
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:47 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 09:09:11AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Just a reminder that the EPEL Steering Committee meeting has been
> > moved to Fridays at 2100 UTC.
> >
> > To find out when that is for you, do
> > date -d "Fri 2100 UTC"
>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:25 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 02:13:22PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > We propose adding:
> >
> > In EPEL 8 or later, it is permitted to have module streams which contain
> > packages with alternate versions to those provided in RHEL. These
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 02:13:22PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> We propose adding:
>
> In EPEL 8 or later, it is permitted to have module streams which contain
> packages with alternate versions to those provided in RHEL. These packages
> may be newer, built with different options, or even
