The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
599 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
341 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
339
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 2:27 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 14:54, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to build a package that requires swig 3.0.12+. The version in
>> EPEL is way too old but swig3 is provided in the extras repo.
>>
>> I was able to build locally via
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 14:54, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm trying to build a package that requires swig 3.0.12+. The version in
> EPEL is way too old but swig3 is provided in the extras repo.
>
> I was able to build locally via mock and COPR fine, but when I tried
> official builds it doesn't look
I'm trying to build a package that requires swig 3.0.12+. The version in
EPEL is way too old but swig3 is provided in the extras repo.
I was able to build locally via mock and COPR fine, but when I tried
official builds it doesn't look like the "extras" repo is enabled.
Is that on purpose?
If you have questions or comments about the survey to discuss on the
mailing list, use this thread:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/NAACOHBWTKAZN3IOQKWDNTEHS2BQ6OVJ/
-- Forwarded message -
From: Daniel Mach
Date: Fri, Apr 3,
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
27 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-02f03affd4
ansible-2.9.6-1.el8
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2cb1029c5a
okular-18.12.2-2.el8
11