[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2020-07-15 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 701 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 440 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7 150

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2020-07-15 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8c3e76982e python-rsa-3.4.2-1.el6 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7b550f6ce5 python-gnupg-0.4.6-1.el6 2

[EPEL-devel] Re: Puppet 6 in EPEL 8

2020-07-15 Thread Breno Brand Fernandes
That's correct. When I started the idea was for me to take care of the epel8 branch. I've been more into Fedora lately and we might push it to Rawhide soon. I'm in touch with other maintainers of the package to make it happen. Thanks for asking. - Breno On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 09:02, Stephen

[EPEL-devel] Re: gcc-gnat

2020-07-15 Thread Björn Persson
Thanks Stephen and Florian for your input. It's now clear that a package that only adds the "missing pieces" won't work. Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > 1. Make a non-default module which contained all the rebuilt binaries > needed to make gcc-gnat and other tools work (some languages also need >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Puppet 6 in EPEL 8

2020-07-15 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 19:41, Igor Raits wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 10:35 -0400, Breno Brand Fernandes wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've just pushed puppet 6 (agent) to EPEL 8 (testing) today [1]. > > > > If you use puppet 6 and have a