The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e44380bc7a
php-horde-kronolith-4.2.29-1.el6
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e54cfb4880
singularity-3.6.0-1.el6
9
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
710 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
449 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b
bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7
159
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-12d0e14fab
cacti-1.2.13-1.el8 cacti-spine-1.2.13-1.el8
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1c906e59bb
mbedtls-2.16.7-1.el8
9
Hi,
As discussed in the EPEL Steering Committee meeting, I made a python
script, will-it-install.py out of a different script I had just
made.[1]
It looks like it's working pretty good for both rawhide and centos 8
(with EPEL8).
To run,
Download the whole directory structure [2], edit package.list
On 24. 07. 20 19:05, Carl George wrote:
Is there a better way to achieve the results with less
risk?
What I do for this is run podman containers. I create local images of
centos+epel, then use a helper script to run them with a podman volume
mounted at/var/cache/{yum,dnf}. With my script I
> Is there a better way to achieve the results with less
> risk?
What I do for this is run podman containers. I create local images of
centos+epel, then use a helper script to run them with a podman volume
mounted at /var/cache/{yum,dnf}. With my script I can run repoquery
commands prefixed by
