On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:08 AM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Why openblas-0.3.5 is waiting for stable branch since 2 years? [1]
>
> Is it reasonable, taking into account the rebuilds of dependent
> packages, to rebuild openblas on epel7 by using a more recent GCC
> version like GCC-8
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12/3/20 10:06 PM, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Is %generate_buildrequires suppose to work for packages
which do not used python ?
Yes, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
Thanks. Now that I read that, this looks like a
Hi all.
Why openblas-0.3.5 is waiting for stable branch since 2 years? [1]
Is it reasonable, taking into account the rebuilds of dependent
packages, to rebuild openblas on epel7 by using a more recent GCC
version like GCC-8 or GCC-9 ?
[1]
