The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
ctstream-32-1.el8
goaccess-1.5.4-1.el8
libolm-3.2.10-1.el8
mod_markdown-1.0.4-3.2025git1bf4fb4.el8
qpid-proton-0.36.0-1.el8
Details about builds:
==
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-af51ba0333
wordpress-5.1.12-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
btrbk-0.31.3-1.el7
ctstream-32-1.el7
mod_mar
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 9:32 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I happened to hit a request for adding web-assets-devel binary package of
> web-assets component to EPEL 9 (bug #2036086) while web-assets-filesystem
> binary package is shipped in RHEL. I recall it is allowed, but ones need to
> foll
Hello,
I happened to hit a request for adding web-assets-devel binary package of
web-assets component to EPEL 9 (bug #2036086) while web-assets-filesystem
binary package is shipped in RHEL. I recall it is allowed, but ones need to
follow some rules which I cannot find now.
Current Packaging guide
On Monday, January 10, 2022 11:22:03 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> **So the plan is to move to RHEL + EPEL next Monday, 2022-01-17.** If
> everything works well at least.
Forgot to mention. This is already deployed to the devel instance. If you want
to give it a try, feel free:
https://cop
Hello maintainers.
Currently, we build all EPEL variants against CentOS "base" in Fedora
Copr, i.e. epel-* configs means CentOS+EPEL. By the end of January 2022
CentOS 8 mirrors will start disappearing, pushing us to change the configs
to avoid build failures.
We would like to start the migrati
