[EPEL-devel] Re: Heads-up: trousers (TPM 1.2) silently orphaned

2022-01-15 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 11:42:34AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:20 AM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > It does seem to be used by robosignatory (the thing that signs Fedora > > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 01. 22 18:41, Orion Poplawski wrote: I was also confused about two things here: - It's retired on the "main" branch, but the c9s branch seems intact. Indeed, that is how this was done for many (all?) retired c9s packages. I believe this is confusing. - What does "retired for

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 01. 22 21:42, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 1/15/22 12:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-pytest-cov is something I've lobbied has no business in an enterprise distro at all.  ...    ... As for EPEL I strongly suggest not to introduce

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 01. 22 20:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-pytest-cov is something I've lobbied has no business in an enterprise distro at all. ...    ... As for EPEL I strongly suggest not to introduce python-pytest-cov either. If your package

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 1:29 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 1/14/22 05:02, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:31 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 14. 01. 22 5:11, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >>> While working on EPEL9, it seems that even more packages are missing from > >>> RHEL9

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 1/15/22 12:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-pytest-cov is something I've lobbied has no business in an enterprise distro at all. ...    ... As for EPEL I strongly suggest not to introduce python-pytest-cov either. If your package

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 1/14/22 10:33, Troy Dawson wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 8:13 AM Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 10:57, Stephen John Smoogen mailto:smo...@gmail.com>> wrote: I mirrored the source rpms down and did the following for 8 and

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:29 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > I don't buy any of these arguments, and it doesn't really address the > situation of "missing -devel" packages. The missing devel packages for shipped libraries are a clear pain point for those that just want build something for their EL

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Andrew C Aitchison
On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-pytest-cov is something I've lobbied has no business in an enterprise distro at all. ... ... As for EPEL I strongly suggest not to introduce python-pytest-cov either. If your package depends on it, please drop the dependency

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 1/14/22 05:02, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:31 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 14. 01. 22 5:11, Orion Poplawski wrote: While working on EPEL9, it seems that even more packages are missing from RHEL9 than were in RHEL8. The latest I found was cppunit, which appears to be

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 1/14/22 19:45, epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: On 1/14/22 03:29, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 14. 01. 22 5:11, Orion Poplawski wrote: While working on EPEL9, it seems that even more packages are missing from RHEL9 than were in RHEL8.  The latest I found was cppunit, which appears to be

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 01. 22 11:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: As for EPEL I strongly suggest not to introduce python-pytest-cov either. If your package depends on it, please drop the dependency instead, see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_linters And this goes without saying: If

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 01. 22 3:45, Orion Poplawski wrote: Others: python-pytest-cov ->   python-pyttest-xdist ->     python-execnet ->   python-gevent ->     python-zope-interface ->   python-zope-testing   python-apipkg