On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:31:37 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> Is not an negative feedback, is a side note but I realize some time
> ago that version with next is bigger than version without next [1]
> therefore we should find a way that the el8 version be greater than
> the el8.next version.
>
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6b5f919719
tor-0.4.8.9-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f535d91d21
chromium-119.0.6045.123-1.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedorapr
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c9409db037
audiofile-0.3.6-36.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
aml-0.3.0-2.el9
chromium-119.0.6045.159-1.el9
Hi,
Is not an negative feedback, is a side note but I realize some time
ago that version with next is bigger than version without next [1]
therefore we should find a way that the el8 version be greater than the
el8.next version.
[1]
rpmdev-vercmp 1.el8.next 1.el8
1.el8.next > 1.el8
On Fri,
I haven't heard any negative feedback from these.
I will untag these today.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:55 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> The following packages have the same version in epel-next as in epel.
> I plan on untagging them from epel-next unless people tell me otherwise.
>
> epel8-next:
> boi
The build error is probably because qbittorrent 4.6.0 is the first version that
requires rb_libtorrent 2.0.9, as can be seen here:
https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/commit/f5a4065101b3231377fcc510eb0522533347786f
rb_libtorrent is at 2.0.8 in EPEL9, so it will need to be updated first.
--
I want it just haven't had a chance to circle back. I saw this email and
glanced back at it but I've been traveling this week.
I'll finish the EPEL request per docs this week and get this rolling.
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023, 09:04 Troy Dawson wrote:
> It looks like Jonathan Wright was the person who
It looks like Jonathan Wright was the person who first requested it, I
don't know if he wants it or not..
I find it interesting that the person who has been maintaining the package
in Fedora for the past couple years isn't listed on the owners list.
Doing some quick scratch builds, it looks like t
