Hi Miro,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 02:51:33PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently took python-mistune in Fedora.
> I am not interested in maintaining it in EPEL.
>
> It is branched for epel7, epel8 and epel9.
>
> @epel-packagers-sig is a collaborator so I assume somebody built
As we discussed during last meeting, here is a poll to check if there is a
timeslot that can fit more of the people that are currently interested to
participate in the EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
https://whenisgood.net/EPEL_Steering_Committee_2024
What day and time would you like? Paint
On 10. 01. 24 15:21, Neil Hanlon wrote:
I'll take this one for epel.
Thank You, Neil. Done.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the `godot` [0] package in Fedora and EPEL7 (as well as
the
upstream maintainer).
I'm following the documented procedure [1] to retire this package.
I announced my intent to retire this package from EPEL7 back in October 2023
[2].
Nobody volunteered to take it over
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024, 08:51 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently took python-mistune in Fedora.
> I am not interested in maintaining it in EPEL.
>
> It is branched for epel7, epel8 and epel9.
>
> @epel-packagers-sig is a collaborator so I assume somebody built this in
> epel9
> without
Hello,
I recently took python-mistune in Fedora.
I am not interested in maintaining it in EPEL.
It is branched for epel7, epel8 and epel9.
@epel-packagers-sig is a collaborator so I assume somebody built this in epel9
without taking responsibility.
There is a low impact CVE:
