epel-testing now. That update will install python3-authres,
> so you may way to clean up the pip-installed copy you
> mention below.
Except... for EPEL 9, there is no python3-authres. There is a request
for it to be added though:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
Once upon a time, Jonathan Wright said:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 9:37 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Jonathan Wright said:
> > > I've replied and offered to co-maintain the package. If the current
> > > maintainer doesn't reply in 2 week
ests.
If you do pick it up... looking at old pure-ftpd bugs, please see my
comment in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502754
--
Chris Adams
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
Hat_ in building, but they are not exclusively build-time
packages by a long shot.
--
Chris Adams
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
r enabling/disabling repos, again so
that a URL change or such would still be applied.
Long term, it might be ideal to treat the RPM-distributed repo files as
read-only and move them to something like /usr/share/yum.repos.d, with
only local changes (enable/disable, exclude, alternate mirror/baseurl)
ar to how you can drop overrides for systemd unit
> files.
I've wanted (and suggested) something like this for ages, for a
different reason: ability to drop-in local mirror configs, again without
modifying the RPM-packaged config.
--
Chris Adams
___
e
ase.
I just made this suggestion as a way to avoid anything unclear in the
License field, but it would also allow any future alternate license
strings to be clearly used.
--
Chris Adams
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
Once upon a time, Gary Buhrmaster said:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:29 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> > Would it make sense to make ALL the new tags be SPDX:, at least for
> > an interim period (of years most likely) where both old and new tags are
> > allowed?
>
> I don&#x
ars most likely) where both old and new tags are
allowed?
--
Chris Adams
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fed
Once upon a time, Filip Bartmann said:
> Hello,
> how can I request cerbot rpm for epel 9?
This is a work in progress, because of all the dependencies of certbot.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041142
--
Chris Adams
___
epel
Hi,
I'm getting a yum update failure with seamonkey 2.53.7-4 which requires libaom
(src rpm=aom), which doesn't have a clean update path:
# yum update seamonkey libaom
Loaded plugins: aliases, changelog, kabi, langpacks, post-transaction-actions,
priorities, protectbase, ps, remove-with-leaves
Certainly! Done. Thanks for the polite pointer.
On 7/17/20 9:01 AM, Patrick Riehecky wrote:
> Can you open a bugzilla requesting this be added to EPEL8?
>
> Pat
>
> On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 22:01 -0400, Chris Schanzle wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Clusterssh is a nice t
Hi,
Clusterssh is a nice tool to send input to multiple ssh sessions simultaneously
-- handy for managing a cluster of systems. I don't know if there is much
other interest for clusterssh, but I wanted to share my experience on building
it and it seems like it would be fairly low effort to add
get the desire/need for modularity... it just seems so complicated.
As a really small-time packager, modularity has been over my head (but
the few packages I have don't need it, so I also haven't tried super
hard).
--
Chris Adams
___
epel-devel mailing l
consumer of EPEL, I'd rather nothing in the base RHEL (or really
CentOS in my case) ever get replaced, up or downgrade, by something in
EPEL.
Unless... does RHEL have modules that replace base packages? I admit, I
haven't fully got my head wrapped around all the effects of m
using the update on multiple CentOS 7 systems
(some with firewalld and some with iptables) without errors.
--
Chris Adams
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproj
do anything, I have to go
fumble through the steps required (trying to follow online
documentation, which I usually screw up, like I think I checked my
source tarball into git like a moron).
--
Chris Adams
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedo
if that doesn't make sense (like I said, still
trying to get my head around modularity).
--
Chris Adams
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Co
I haven't really dug into version 8 yet. I do use screen
a lot, so what does "inside of the Red Hat hidden buildroot package set"
mean for me?
--
Chris Adams
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
Thanks a lot Kevin!
I can confirm it built perfectly! (ref
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33328352)
I truly appreciate your help!
Chris
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 1:16 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 3/8/19 6:01 PM, Chris wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I apolo
edora
community.
Thanks in advance!
Chris
On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 4:46 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> I have created https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8185 for the releng
> ticket and referenced the bugzilla.
>
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 at 16:23, Chris wrote:
> >
> > >
f to /opt in EPEL is that it doesn't
get tested like that in Fedora, and causes definate diversion from
Fedora's "norms", so it puts more burden on packages. Also, it makes it
somewhat more difficult to move something from a Fedora install to
Thanks, I'll monitor that bug id.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Christopher Meng
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110354
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list
> epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
Will inotify-tools be released for centos7? Any idea on timeline for?
Thanks
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Are there admins that find EPEL but can't
find other repos?
I definately see retiring the obsolete packages, but what is gained for
EPEL to package READMEs telling people that bother to read them to
install another repo.
--
Chris Adams
___
epel-dev
25 matches
Mail list logo
