Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL package rebased upon RHEL update?

* Versions lower than 2.8 had been dropped from supported lifecycle for a long time. * Backporting fixes to 2.4 doesn't make too much sense. * Config change is needed (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/2.6/00-RELEASENOTES). -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io

[EPEL-devel] EPEL package rebased upon RHEL update?

Hi, Redis in EPEL6 is pretty dated, I'd like to update it to the latest 2.x version but somehow I haven't done major update like this. Is it allowed to update the package from 2.4 to 2.8 for new RHEL 6.x like 6.8 release? Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io

Re: EPEL noip and pnp4nagios epel7 availibility

You can report a bug against noip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedoraversion=rawhidecomponent=noip IMO noip should switch to systemd. I've written one and if noip Fedora maintainer won't maintain it in EPEL, I could offer a hand.

Re: EPEL noip and pnp4nagios epel7 availibility

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:55 PM, LOEFFLER Peter peter.loeff...@herold.at wrote: I think it's a good idea to switch to systemd. Did i get it right that i shoud report a bug that a systemd script is missing and you will offer it at bugzilla? You can report a bug first, I will arrive there

Re: EPEL moving epel 7 out of beta

Good to hear. Thanks! -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

Re: EPEL testing-epel7 : availability date

There are packages still notready for EPEL7 at least. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

Re: EPEL importing a slew of packages into 7?

Have you asked the Fedora maintainer of those 21 packages? ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

Re: EPEL 7 package requests: pyephem, blt, tcllib, tdom

Actually the epel7 Request page should only be edited by the existing packagers, or someone may get annoyed. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

Re: EPEL 7 package requests: pyephem, blt, tcllib, tdom

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Zhiwei Zhu z_...@wargaming.net wrote: Hi Christopher, I have removed the part added by me. Sorry for the mistake. Well no problem, you are new to here ;) We need to focus on these packages now as they are required by people. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng

Re: EPEL 7 package requests: pyephem, blt, tcllib, tdom

This list is not the right place to discuss these stuffs. If you want to let them land in the EPEL7, please fill bugs in Bugzilla against the relevant component. I'm sure most of the owners of those packages may not subscribe to this list. ___

Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.

this rpm to repo line. thanks, Have you checked? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543666 Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.

Deps are satisfied already based on the successful build of the thunar. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543669 Thanks for the report. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.

makes the broken xfdesktop in the EPEL7, so he will fix it soon. There are some xfce guys in this list, you can await their answers. Thanks. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel

Re: EPEL getting terminus-fonts added to 7

On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote: I strongly suggest that please also update this package to the latest version 4.39 instead of using 4.38. What is the advantage of 4.39? It is not in rawhide yet though... Version 4.39: - Added ballot, checkmark, heavy

Re: EPEL getting terminus-fonts added to 7

Hi all, I strongly suggest that please also update this package to the latest version 4.39 instead of using 4.38. Thanks. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

Re: EPEL xfig is absent in epel-release-7-0.2

You'd better open a bug in the bugzilla under Fedora EPEL against the relevant component if it is available in the EPEL6. If not, open a bug under Fedora and request the epel7 branch. Thanks. ___ epel-devel mailing list

Re: EPEL Maintaining libntlm for ppc64

NO. Feel free to do that. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

EPEL Amazon Linux and

a question, what's the difference between RHEL(CentOS) and Amazon? Thanks. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel

Re: EPEL Amazon Linux and

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Quite a lot; they make no attempt at compatibility. I think I'd respond with that. EPEL packages might work on Amazon Linux, and they might not. Matthew, thanks for your reply. I took the info from the bug, and

Re: EPEL Concerning request for libupnp addition

I've taken the acl. Thanks. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

Re: EPEL Dependency broken for TurboGears-1.1.3-8.el7.noarch

I would suggest you using pip to install these packages. First these packages in repo are old and may not match your need. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852998 Second these packages are used for Fedora infrastructure apps, and since the technology is moving forwardly, these

Re: EPEL Requesting i3* packages for RHEL7

I'm the i3* maintainer now. I will do this of course, but before RHEL7 pushed to final release, please don't rush. Thanks. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

EPEL Should I request epel7 branch in packaging?

Hi, I wonder if I need to add epel7 to the branch list or the system will do for me? I want to package for epel7 also. Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel

Re: EPEL Should I request epel7 branch in packaging?

On Jan 3, 2014 1:02 AM, Kevin Fenzi When we are ready for branches we will announce and that will include the process and what you need to do. Thanks, but what I've seen is that someone is requesting SCM on epel7. I was just curious about that. ___

Re: EPEL epel7 planning and processes

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Morten Stevens mstev...@fedoraproject.org wrote: My preference is also el7, because we have also a Packager and Vendor tag to declare these packages as Fedora EPEL (and not rhel) packages. Why should these 2 tags be used still?

Re: EPEL epel7 planning and processes

branch from EPEL6? How to deal with systemd related things? Is it possible to branch from branches determined by packagers? ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

EPEL lynis is now in testing

Hi, I've created this package since 1.3.6 in EPEL branch so sysadmins you can use this awesome tools to check your system's security via `sudo yum install lynis`. Note please don't rely on this software blindly. Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd

EPEL dropbear update

Hi all, dropbear in EPEL6 will be updated to 2013.62 later in updates-testing with support of ECC. Full changelog is there: https://matt.ucc.asn.au/dropbear/CHANGES If you have any questions or objections, please reply here. Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd

Re: EPEL Port oat package into

RHN is RHN, but not EPEL. http://pkgs.org/search/?keyword=sun-codemodel ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel