On 21/09/2022 12:49, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote:
good question, and sorry to keep you waiting for this long time without
an answer. I changed roles in my job, leading to less and less time to
contribute. The messaging SIG did not attract the contributors I hoped
it would. I
On 03/09/2022 20:32, Robby Callicotte via epel-devel wrote:
Hello all,
I recently stumbled onto this bugzilla issue[1]. It has gone a couple of
months without a response from the assignee. I know that the stalled package
request procedures can be started now, but I also see that RabbitMQ was
On 08/11/16 16:31, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> I believe the future of Django in EPEL is a topic that is being
> discussed on the EPSCO meetings last week and this week (18:00 UTC on
> Wednesdays in #fedora-meeting, iirc).
>
> I'm hoping that even if a newer, 1.8 based Django package is added to
>
On 23/08/16 03:48, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Gallagher
>> >
>> Let me (or open a rel-eng ticket) when you want a epel7-nodejs6 side
>> tag to build it into. Will make it easier so you don't need to deal
>> with a billion
On 09/03/16 20:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> -b- We re-review Django14 and put it in. However there are 4+
>> security problems which can't be fixed without a major version move.
>> Because of this , the package may not pass review.
Because it has been retired upstream, I'm not sure if anyone
that package didn't change for a long time, I wouldn't expect any
real difference between those two.
Matthias
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6107
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
On 21/08/14 05:20, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Just trying to see what's the status of the python26 package in EPEL5.
It doesn't appear to have been updated for a while:
* Wed Nov 07 2012 Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com - 2.6.8-2
- Patch 121 forces sys.platform to linux2
related to issue
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:33:50AM +0300, Anssi Johansson wrote:
I'm still of the opinion that if a package in EPEL is no longer
maintained and it has known security issues, it should be removed
from EPEL.
That will happen, in the next few weeks, as far as I know.
Matthias
--
Matthias
On 01/08/2014 01:37 AM, Jason Helfman wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there are any efforts being made into getting the Django
package updated for the epel repository?
Currently it is Django14, and we are running an application that requires at
a minimum 15.
Any update is appreciated
not that simple. Django-1.1 is ways older; I don't know,
how many known security issues exist. Newer Django versions require
newer python there.
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
11 matches
Mail list logo