Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le
it, please reply to this email.
This proposal is open for discussion for a week, and will be reviewed at
the next EPEL meeting, per
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-retirement/
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org
Forgot to cc: epel-devel - but django3 will be available after the next
compose tonight!
Best regards,
Michel
- Forwarded message from Michel Alexandre Salim
-
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 14:01:22 -0500
From: Michel Alexandre Salim
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject
ussion in the EPEL meeting today, this is good to go ahead;
I have done the builds and put up Bodhi updates:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=0.5.1=libkdumpfile=EPEL-9=EPEL-8
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d
cc-ing the epel-devel list too
On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 14:39 -0600, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Dear fellow Fedorans,
>
> It seems that python-mysqlclient will now transparently upgrade
> python-
> mysql since 2.1.1-2 (for Fedora):
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/py
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 14:09 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:37 PM Troy Dawson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:21 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Pe
eck: 0:00:16 ago on Wed Feb 8 11:15:35
2023.
drgn-0:0.0.22-1.el8.x86_64
libkdumpfile-devel-0:0.4.1-5.el8.x86_64
libkdumpfile-util-0:0.4.1-5.el8.x86_64
python3-libkdumpfile-0:0.4.1-5.el8.x86_64
[1]:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/
Thanks,
--
Mic
(beyond the few allowlisted subsets like the Nvidia drivers).
Amending the incompatible update policy to mention RPM Fusion is
probably a no-go, but maybe mentioning "consider testing against
well-known and popular third party repos" is doable?
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
ident
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 07:11:19PM +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 7:03 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We should probably retire weechat from EPEL 7 - it has multiple CVEs
> > that can only be fixed by updat
aul or myself really care enough about EL7 to
maintain a divergent spec. If someone does still care, PR appreciated to
fix this, otherwise consider this the first notice that I'll retire this
branch in a few days.
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 04:11:43PM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> When going over my packager dashboard, I noticed that Selenium has not
> been updated for a while.
>
> I cleaned up and redid
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-selenium/pull-request/3, and t
a LICENSE file) and then build the last 4.x
tarball I can find on PyPI for Rawhide. If it works for rebuilding
Django then I will also build that for EPEL 9.
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
signature.asc
Description
On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 15:06 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Michel Alexandre Salim
> said:
> > This won't be ready until EPEL 10 or even 11, but one thing I've
> > discussed with the DNF maintainer is the possibility of having
> > something like /etc/yum
> not pulled in by default and requires epel-release. Thus you could
> tell people to install `epel-release-enable-crb` and would get
> packages and if people have reports of broken packages you tell them
> to install this which will do the correct repo changes.
>
This won't b
y.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 11:42:34AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:20 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > It does seem to be used by robosi
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 10:35 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:11:53AM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > `trousers` got silent
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:11:53AM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> `trousers` got silently orphaned around the time an EPEL9 branch for it
> was requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032258
>
> Looks like we're slowly uncoupling ours
? If so someone who needs it should
probably step up, if not, we should toggle it off in these packages.
Maintainers BCC:ed.
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
legacy subpackages
- shipping subpackages that are hard-disabled in C8S/C9S (e.g.
systemd-extras shipping networkd and timesyncd).
I've filed an issue to bring up to next week's EPEL meeting, please send
your suggestions there: https://pagure.io/epel/issue/134
Thanks!
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 03:21:35PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 03:50:44PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 15:48 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > >
> > > This shows the minimum changes needed to:
.spec
python-pysb.spec
python-pyvirtualize.spec
python-qt5.spec
python-requests-oauthlib.spec
python-sphinx-bootstrap-theme.spec
python-sphinx_lv2_theme.spec
python-stuf.spec
python-unidecode.spec
python-urlobject.spec
python-vevents.spec
python-vpoller.spec
python-wrapt.spec
pyt
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 05:56:20PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi Pat,
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 03:16:30PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> > That sounds super neat!
> >
> > Last time I looked at what it would take for cinnamon on EPEL8 the
> > base des
intaining the whole desktop but just enough to get the
file manager running.
Hoping to hear from Leigh, but if I don't hear otherwise and the
packages work fine, I'll request comaintainership for the packages I
need and ask to be set as the EPEL POC next week.
Best regards,
--
Michel Ale
building the whole Cinnamon (yet),
cinnamon-desktop is actually just some shared libraries.
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel
interested in file managers in general, and would not mind
co-maintaining these set of four packages just to check them out, but if
there are valid reasons why they are not available then I will just
disable nextcloud-client-nemo when building on EL8.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile
break any dependencies though.
Would you happen to know what is the minimum pygit2 version that would
work for rpmautospec?
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
ill be around for a while, it sounds like it would be
of benefits if we can keep the same spec between Rawhide and it. e.g.
python-TestSlide now uses rpmautospec in the Rawhide branch, and so any
update in EPEL8 will have to diverge.
cc:ing the EPEL devel list so we can discuss if we want to do this
in RHEL/CentOS proper) were too out of date.
I think libuv was one of them, and it's been updated for RHEL 8.4 after
I requested it, so I'll see if I can do an update later this week. Busy
wrapping up at work until then.
Cheers,
--
Michel Alexandre Sa
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 12:14:09PM -0400, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 11:08 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> > I might eventually extend python-bugzilla a bit to make it easier to
> > do this. A lot of the operations seem to assume it's a small Bugzilla
>
nfig-manager, is the only
way.
One problem is, once you touch the .repo file, you will no longer pick up any
changes
introduced by later RPM updates (though that's rare) since they are marked
`%config(noreplace)`
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@mic
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 06:24:57AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:20 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > V Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 06:33:51PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
> > > I'm working on a tool to make it easier to create EPEL branch requests
&g
,
but I'll experiment with the wording first when testing the tool.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel
with no Bodhi gating until GA seems like a
nice idea. To add another variant to this: we can also start enabling
Bodhi but with time-to-stable set to 3 days (like Fedora betas) once
RHEL 9 is in beta? i.e. "we think c9s should have stabilized enough by
now that we can start gating EPEL packa
added to the wiki
- the mechanism for joining the SIG (currently borrowed from the
provenpackagers instructions but lowered the acceptance threshold given
there's not that many SIG members yet)
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name
chat via
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 12:32 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> I split my time between the latest Fedora and the latest CentOS these
> days, and it would make dogfooding packaging changes for CentOS/EPEL
> much easier if all the packager utilities are available. Right now,
tch to hardcode dependencies for non-Fedora releases,
though that sorts of defeat the purpose of dynamic build requirements.
Then again, this is only needed for EPEL8, since EPEL9 will have a new
enough RPM.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name
chat
on epel-devel
Let's continue discussing the proposal in this thread, as suggested
during the meeting.
Thanks all,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2
On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 15:44 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:10 PM Robbie Harwood
> wrote:
> > Michel Alexandre Salim writes:
> >
> > > * Have an expedited flow where this SIG can request EPEL branches
> > > and
> > > admin acc
into the EL development
process.
== Scope ==
* Proposal Owners
* Ask Infra to set up EPEL SIG ACL and mailing list (for Bugzilla)
* Announce this in epel-devel
* Have documentation for the SIG as part of the EPEL documentation
* Help onboard people to this SIG
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
ndividual packager having to worry about it.
So... masas-retire package.cfg, perhaps?
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2
signature.asc
Description:
t some karma would get it to
> stable faster.
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d49300e014
>
Upvoted, thanks! It's on its way to stable now.
--
Michel
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:39 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm
- 5.68.0-1
- 5.68
-2 got backed out because it's broken, but -1 is also broken:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50518058
"Unknown build format, exiting!"
Could -3 be pushed out? Also, thanks tis@ for noticing the macro
version discrepancy!
--
Michel Alexandre Sal
ploy
RPM-with-zstd internally).
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 96A7 A6ED FB4D 2113 4056 3257 CAF9 AD10 ACB1 BEF2
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 5/14/20 1:03 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:32 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/zstd/history/dead.package?identifier=epel8
The package is only in BaseOS in 8.2 though, and CentOS 8.2 is not out
-- the only repo that has it now is 8
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 96A7 A6ED FB4D 2113 4056 3257 CAF9 AD10 ACB1 BEF2
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epe
it and are
merging master over it.
Interesting. Could you help take a look at
- python-mimeparse
- python-testscenarios
and help figure out how epel8 and master end up sharing a history?
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key
On 5/1/20 1:10 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do we
expect every package in EPEL8 to also be built for EPEL8-playground, either
through package.cfg
On 4/30/20 1:46 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 30. 04. 20 3:58, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Is the epel8-playground builder somehow using an different version of
python-rpm-macros? Happy to file a bug if I know where this should go.
I have an active buildroot override for epel8 epel-rpm-macros
On 4/29/20 6:58 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
sh-4.4# rpm -q python-rpm-macros
python-rpm-macros-3-37.el8.noarch
```
Is the epel8-playground builder somehow using an different version of
python-rpm-macros? Happy to file a bug if I know where this should go.
root.log says epel8
-macros? Happy to file a bug if I know where this should go.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 96A7 A6ED FB4D 2113 4056 3257 CAF9 AD10 ACB1 BEF2
___
epel-devel mailing list
On 4/29/20 4:12 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 4/29/20 3:06 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
That's probably because of Carl George deleted the
package.cfg configuration from epel8 branch to mirror the builds into
epel8-buildroot:
commit dd46fcc88a92241e2aa776208cf7ef0dddbab541
Author: Carl George
ly stay there.
I'm restoring that commit.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 96A7 A6ED FB4D 2113 4056 3257 CAF9 AD10 ACB1 BEF2
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lis
not be found.
Does the playground setup not take overrides into account?
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 96A7 A6ED FB4D 2113 4056 3257 CAF9 AD10 ACB1 BEF2
___
epel-devel mailing
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
> On 06/24/2017 11:01 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > python-greenlet was marked as dead.package for the epel7 branch because
> > it's in rhel-extras:
> >
> > however, it seems
55 matches
Mail list logo
