On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 9:33 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> I notice that you said crb-enable, crb-disable.
> Do you like having the name first, or the function first?
I'd put in a vote for "object action" like Carl denoted.
As a side note, and this is more for personal learning/clarification,
is
e, and the contents are the EPEL
packages that will either require/recommend/etc it at their install
time. At least I'm pretty sure that's what "--whatdepends" means.
--
Mike Rochefort
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.
.x86_64 is shipped
> in AppStream and should satisfy the dependency for lutris.x86_64 in
> EPEL.
The multilib aspect is definitely the biggest quirk and I don't know
the best approach besides just outright removing i686 CRB packages
from the results.
--
Mike Rochefort, RHCE
Solution Architect
Red Hat NA
seful to know if this methodology is flawed and
inaccurate.
https://gitlab.com/omenos/crb-depends
--
Mike Rochefort
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
Hi Filip,
> how can I request cerbot rpm for epel 9?
You can find the instructions for requesting an EPEL package in the
documentation here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/
--
Mike Rochefort
___
epel-devel mail
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:50 PM Stefan Bluhm
wrote:
>
> it provides "java-11-headless". Not "java-headless". At least not on my
> machine
Doing my own checks on CentOS Stream 8 and RHEL 8.4, this sounds like a Fedora
change that didn't make its way back to RHEL. Worth opening a Bugzilla
report
