Re: [EPEL-devel] [CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-22 Thread Brian Stinson
On Sep 21 20:58, Haïkel wrote: > 2015-09-21 19:46 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi : > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:12:07 +0200 > > Haïkel wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about > >> EPEL's future. Since the

Re: [EPEL-devel] [CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-22 Thread Lalatendu Mohanty
On 09/21/2015 07:42 PM, Haïkel wrote: Hi, Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about EPEL's future. Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, there was little progress on that topic After a discussion with a Smooge, I decided to come with a proposal, knowing

Re: [EPEL-devel] [CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/21/2015 07:12 AM, Haïkel wrote: > * EPEL will use CentOS repositories instead of mirroring RHEL > repositories Worth noting that one of the values people get (or perceive) about EPEL is that it is built against RHEL repositories. This is really

Re: [EPEL-devel] [CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Dave Johansen
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Haïkel wrote: > Hi, > > Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about EPEL's > future. > Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, there was little > progress on that topic > > After a discussion with a

Re: [EPEL-devel] [CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Haïkel
2015-09-21 16:38 GMT+02:00 Dave Johansen : > > > I'm a maintainer of several EPEL packages and a CentOS user. After reading > through this, I don't understand the value in this shift. Also, what are the > potential negatives of the change? > Thanks, > Dave > I don't see