Hi
Ok that makes sense.
Thank you
Le Wed Feb 03 2021 17:48:32 GMT+0100 (CET), Troy Dawson
a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 3:16 AM john tatt wrote:
>
> Hi
> So if I understand well, an EPEL package could have to be desinstalled just
> because an update in Stream make it not
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 3:16 AM john tatt wrote:
>
> Hi
> So if I understand well, an EPEL package could be have to be desinstalled
> just because an update in Stream make it not compatible any more ?
> Strange
>
Yes and no
Yes - If you are running CentOS Stream, and don't have the epel-next
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 11:14:38AM +, john tatt wrote:
> So if I understand well, an EPEL package could be have to be desinstalled
> just because an update in Stream make it not compatible any more ?
All changes landing in Stream are already approved to land in a RHEL minor
release. So this
Hi
So if I understand well, an EPEL package could be have to be desinstalled just
because an update in Stream make it not compatible any more ?
Strange
Le Mon Feb 01 2021 17:49:41 GMT+0100 (CET), Stephen John Smoogen
a écrit :
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 11:00, Filip Bartmann wrote:
On 03. 02. 21 12:58, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 02. 21 12:14, john tatt wrote:
Hi
So if I understand well, an EPEL package could be have to be desinstalled just
because an update in Stream make it not compatible any more ?
No.
Apologies, I've misread your email and I've mistaken
On 03. 02. 21 12:14, john tatt wrote:
Hi
So if I understand well, an EPEL package could be have to be desinstalled just
because an update in Stream make it not compatible any more ?
No.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 11:00, Filip Bartmann wrote:
> Hello,
> what version of RedHat will EPEL now follow? Centos Stream or oficial
> RedHat and Rocky based on stable RHEL?
>
>
The main EPEL packages have always been compiled against the official Red
Hat Enterprise Linux current package set.
