Based on feedback received I have just added "EPEL 8" and "EPEL 8
playground" collections to Koschei. For now only a single package is
tracked in each collection - epel-release package, but are free to add
more packages as needed.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:15 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:53 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 03:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >
> > Fedora infrastructure has been asked [1] to enable Koschei [2] for
> > EPEL 8. Would this be useful to anyone? If yes, which of build targets
> > (epel8-candidate,
> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> Can koschei be limited to a single architecture or does it need to
SJS> build against all targets? I am worried about the number of s390
SJS> builds we may be adding.
Currently it only does builds for aarch64, ppc64le and x86_64, so it
does at
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:19 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:15:47AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > Fedora infrastructure has been asked [1] to enable Koschei [2] for
> > EPEL 8. Would this be useful to anyone?
>
> Yes.
>
> > If yes, which of build targets
> >
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 03:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> Fedora infrastructure has been asked [1] to enable Koschei [2] for
> EPEL 8. Would this be useful to anyone? If yes, which of build targets
> (epel8-candidate, epel8-playground-candidate) should Koschei submit
> scratch builds for?
>
Can
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:15:47AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Fedora infrastructure has been asked [1] to enable Koschei [2] for
> EPEL 8. Would this be useful to anyone?
Yes.
> If yes, which of build targets
> (epel8-candidate, epel8-playground-candidate) should Koschei submit
> scratch
